Research Article

The Effect of a Mechanical Compression Device and Supraglottic Airway on Flow Time: A Simulation Study of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in a High-Rise Building

Table 2

Comparison of chest compression indices and flow times.

Manual compression groupsMechanical compression groupsp
MABMASMEBMES

Chest compression index:
Compression depth (mm)57.2 ± 2.456.8 ± 2.956.0 ± 2.055.1 ± 2.20.41
Compression rate (n/min) 113.6 ± 4.6113.7 ± 3.6111.3 ± 2.0111.0 ± 1.90.21
Incomplete chest recoil ratio (%)5.0 (4.3–9.3)6.0 (3.3–8.8)11.0 (8.3–16.8)8.5 (6.0–10.8)0.47
Flow time fraction (%)66.5 (61.7–67.3)72.1 (69.2–72.7)70.5 (67.6–71.8)75.5 (73.9–76.8) §<0.001
Flow time (s)290.3 ± 13.3332.2 ± 27.1348.6 ± 12.0378.2 ± 16.5 §<0.001
Scenario duration (s)446.8 ± 22.4472.9 ± 30.6500.6 ± 24.9501.3 ± 20.7<0.001
Activity during no-flow time:
Rhythm analysis and defibrillator charging (s)13.9 ± 5.315.4 ± 3.512.4 ± 3.711.6 ± 4.50.10
Artificial ventilation (s)66.2 ± 12.6 49.6 ± 6.0 73.6 ± 9.2 §52.8 ± 7.9<0.001
Moving the manikin (s)76.8 ± 14.770.2 ± 10.93.4 ± 4.33.3 ± 7.9<0.001
Mechanical compressor deployment (s)Not applicableNot applicable62.6 ± 9.055.4 ± 12.80.15
Flow time fraction by phase:
Phase 1 (%)80.5 (76.6–81.7) §81.4 (80.3–83.6) §63.5 (59.6–65.4)67.1 (64.9–68.8)<0.001
Phase 2 (%)0.0 (0–0)0.0 (0–0)91.9 (86.3–90.1)100.0 (96.33–100.0) §<0.001
Phase 3 (%)84.6 (82.9–86.6)98.4 (98.1–100.0)88.5 (86.3–90.1)100.0 (100.0–100.0) §<0.001
Phase 4 (%)0.0 (0–0) 0.0 (0–0)84.2 (80.0–88.7)100.0 (100.0–100.0) §<0.001

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). MAB, manual compression with bag-valve mask; MAS, manual compression with supraglottic airway; MEB, mechanical compression with bag-valve mask; MES, mechanical compression with supraglottic airway. †, ‡, § Significant between group differences demonstrated in the post hoc analysis.