Research Article

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Videos in English on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA Resuscitation Guidelines

Table 6

Average number of views, average video duration, and scores according to video source.

Uploaded by official medical organizationsUploaded by healthcare professionals or organizationsUploaded by unidentified sourcesAll videos

Average views14145 ± 26332
median: 2228
(2–92575)
7999 ± 11882
median: 1052
(5–3374)
5040 ± 24168
median: 134
(4–149996)
8252 ± 21873
median: 275
(2–149996)

Scores as per first evaluation5.70 ± 2.72
median: 5
(2–10)
3.89 ± 2.44
median: 4
(0–9)
4.10 ± 2.19
median: 4
(0–10)
4.43 ± 2.49
median: 4
(0–10)

Scores as per second evaluation0.78 ± 1.73
median: 0
(0–8)
0.36 ± 1.06
median: 0
(0–4)
0.15 ± 0.42
median: 0
(0–2)
0.37 ± 1.09
median: 0
(0–8)

Average total score6.43 ± 3.57
median: 6
(2–17)
4.25 ± 2.49
median: 4
(0–9)
4.24 ± 2.39
median: 4
(0–12)
4.73 ± 2.88
median: 4
(0–17)

Scores of videos according to the criteria selected from the basic cardiac life support algorithms.
Scores of videos based on innovations from the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines.