Research Article
Development and Validation of a Dynamic Prediction Model for Massive Hemorrhage in Trauma
Table 2
Comparison of the models’ effects in 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h groups.
| | ACC | SEN | SPE | PPV | NPV | F1 | AUC |
| 1 h group | 0.683 ± 0.029 | 0.729 ± 0.128 | 0.677 ± 0.036 | 0.235 ± 0.030 | 0.949 ± 0.024 | 0.355 ± 0.049 | 0.763 ± 0.074 | 2 h group | 0.687 ± 0.034 | 0.750 ± 0.161 | 0.678 ± 0.050 | 0.240 ± 0.037 | 0.954 ± 0.026 | 0.362 ± 0.059 | 0.775 ± 0.063 | 3 h group | 0.685 ± 0.032 | 0.714 ± 0.135 | 0.681 ± 0.033 | 0.234 ± 0.044 | 0.946 ± 0.025 | 0.352 ± 0.065 | 0.756 ± 0.055 |
|
|
ACC: accuracy; SEN: sensitivity; SPE: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; F1: F1 score; AUC: area under the curve.
|