Research Article
[Retracted] Clinical Effect and Aesthetic Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Implant Therapy
Table 2
Comparison of aesthetic effect evaluation between the two groups after repair.
| Group | N | Proximal gingival papilla (Score) | Distal gingival papilla (Score) | Labial gingival margin curvature (Score) | Labial gingival margin height (Score) | Root convexity (Score) | Soft tissue color (Score) | Soft tissue texture (Score) |
| Minimally invasive surgery group | 30 | 2.29 ± 0.28 | 2.53 ± 0.19 | 2.40 ± 0.23 | 2.12 ± 0.16 | 2.24 ± 0.36 | 2.70 ± 0.22 | 2.59 ± 0.19 | Routine surgery group | 30 | 2.00 ± 0.41 | 2.13 ± 0.25 | 2.08 ± 0.11 | 1.75 ± 0.13 | 1.92 ± 0.28 | 2.16 ± 0.25 | 2.05 ± 0.32 | t value | | 3.199 | 6.977 | 6.875 | 9.830 | 3.843 | 8.882 | 7.947 | P Value | | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
|
|