Research Article
[Retracted] Clinical Effect and Aesthetic Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Implant Therapy
Table 3
Comparison of repair satisfaction scores between the two groups.
| Group | N | Chewing function (score) | Comfort (minutes) | Aesthetics (score) | Retention function (points) | Language function (points) |
| Minimally invasive surgery group | 30 | 17.42 ± 1.35 | 18.06 ± 1.03 | 18.49 ± 0.53 | 18.72 ± 0.49 | 19.05 ± 0.36 | Routine operation group | 30 | 14.53 ± 1.19 | 15.28 ± 1.27 | 16.24 ± 1.15 | 16.70 ± 0.91 | 17.16 ± 1.03 | t value | | 9.100 | 9.312 | 9.732 | 10.705 | 9.488 | P value | | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
|
|