Epilepsy Research and Treatment

Epilepsy Research and Treatment / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 3581358 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3581358

Marcus C. Ng, Ronan Kilbride, Mirela Simon, Emad Eskandar, Andrew J. Cole, "Hippocampography Guides Consistent Mesial Resections in Neocortical Temporal Lobe Epilepsy", Epilepsy Research and Treatment, vol. 2016, Article ID 3581358, 8 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3581358

Hippocampography Guides Consistent Mesial Resections in Neocortical Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Academic Editor: Roy G. Beran
Received02 Apr 2016
Revised27 Jun 2016
Accepted14 Aug 2016
Published14 Sep 2016


Background. The optimal surgery in lesional neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy is unknown. Hippocampal electrocorticography maximizes seizure freedom by identifying normal-appearing epileptogenic tissue for resection and minimizes neuropsychological deficit by limiting resection to demonstrably epileptogenic tissue. We examined whether standardized hippocampal electrocorticography (hippocampography) guides resection for more consistent hippocampectomy than unguided resection in conventional electrocorticography focused on the lesion. Methods. Retrospective chart reviews any kind of electrocorticography (including hippocampography) as part of combined lesionectomy, anterolateral temporal lobectomy, and hippocampectomy over 8 years . Patients were divided into mesial (i.e., hippocampography) and lateral electrocorticography groups. Primary outcome was deviation from mean hippocampectomy length. Results. Of 26 patients, fourteen underwent hippocampography-guided mesial temporal resection. Hippocampography was associated with 2.6 times more consistent resection. The range of hippocampal resection was 0.7 cm in the mesial group and 1.8 cm in the lateral group (). 86% of mesial group versus 42% of lateral group patients achieved seizure freedom (). Conclusions. By rationally tailoring excision to demonstrably epileptogenic tissue, hippocampography significantly reduces resection variability for more consistent hippocampectomy than unguided resection in conventional electrocorticography. More consistent hippocampal resection may avoid overresection, which poses greater neuropsychological risk, and underresection, which jeopardizes postoperative seizure freedom.

1. Introduction

Most neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy (NTLE) is lesional [1]. When refractory to medications, surgery is pursued but the extent of resection is controversial [2]. The most conservative option is isolated lesionectomy. Another option is lesionectomy with anterolateral temporal lobectomy (ALTL) while avoiding mesial temporal structures. A more aggressive option combines lesionectomy, ALTL, and hippocampectomy (Figure 1). However, even when the neocortical lesion appears to spare mesial structures, hippocampal abnormalities have been demonstrated on magnetic resonance spectroscopy and electrocorticography (ECoG) [3, 4]. While diseased neocortex may be justifiably resected to maximize the chance of postoperative seizure freedom, extending resection into hippocampus is controversial due to the greater risk of neuropsychological deficit [5, 6]. Intraoperative ECoG has been used to strike a balance between seizure freedom and neuropsychological risk in order to clarify optimal resection extent [7, 8]. ECoG can maximize the likelihood of seizure freedom by identifying normal-appearing epileptogenic tissue for resection. ECoG can also minimize the chance of neuropsychological deficit by limiting resection to only demonstrably epileptogenic tissue. However, most ECoG studies do not specifically pertain to NTLE and they adopt heterogeneous methods [9, 10]. Even when ECoG has been used in NTLE, ECoG has conventionally focused on the lateral neocortical lesion rather than mesial temporal structures [9, 10]. When hippocampectomy is performed in these cases, mesial temporal resection has not necessarily been guided by ECoG [11, 12]. Unguided hippocampectomy risks yielding widely variable and arbitrary mesial temporal resections that either miss normal-appearing epileptogenic hippocampal tissue to jeopardize postoperative seizure freedom, or risks unnecessarily overextending hippocampal resection to yield greater neuropsychological deficit. In this study, we assessed the specific impact of standardized mesial temporal ECoG on hippocampectomy in NTLE (in addition to lesionectomy and ALTL). We hypothesize that standardized intraoperative hippocampal ECoG (“hippocampography” or “EHG”) guides mesial temporal resection to yield more consistent and less variable hippocampectomy than unguided mesial temporal resection in “conventional lateral ECoG.”

2. Methods

We obtained approval from the Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Board to perform retrospective chart reviews on lesional NTLE patients from 2006 to 2014 who underwent any kind of ECoG (including EHG) during lesionectomy, ALTL, and hippocampectomy. Epileptologists diagnosed NTLE based on semiology, surface and intracranial EEG, 3- or 7-Tesla MRI, interictal PET, MRS, MEG, and ictal SPECT. Lesional NTLE required an MRI-visible lesion in temporal neocortex with epileptogenic substrate on histopathology. Patients had undergone “mesial ECoG” or conventional “lateral ECoG.” The mesial ECoG group was comprised of EHG in 14 patients. In tandem with ALTL, a depth or strip electrode ranging from 6 cm to 8 cm was placed in or along the ventricular hippocampal surface (Figure 2(a)). A neurophysiologist reviewed live EHG in referential and bipolar montages (Figure 2(b)). Baseline activity was observed under inhalational anesthesia for at least 5 minutes and after intravenous alfentanyl provocation (30 μg/kg up to 2 doses) with particular attention 90–120 seconds after bolus for peak dose effect. Mesial ECoG was augmented by foramen ovale electrodes in 3 patients. The lateral ECoG group was comprised of neocortical subdural grid or strip electrodes (ranging from 8 to 64 contacts) over the lateral temporal, ipsilateral central, parietal, and/or frontal regions in 12 patients to identify extrahippocampal epileptogenic tissue for resection, or eloquent juxtalesional tissue as the boundary of resection. Mesial resection in lateral ECoG was based on visual inspection, except for one patient who underwent both mesial and lateral ECoG. Choice of ECoG was based on whether the neocortical lesion was close to, or extended into, adjacent mesial temporal (“NTLE+M”) or extratemporal regions (“NTLE+E”) on MRI. Where the lesion extended into both regions (“NTLE+M+E”), lateral ECoG was preferred. EHG was also used in comorbid “dual pathology” mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). The primary study outcome was deviation from mean hippocampectomy length in each group. Secondary outcomes were absolute hippocampectomy length, seizure freedom, and any worsening or improvement of neuropsychological performance. Seizure freedom was defined as Engel Class I [13]. Engel Class was determined from the last available clinical note. We specified hippocampectomy length, age, gender, lateral ECoG, lesional spread outside temporal neocortex, comorbid MTS, and follow-up duration as possible confounders of seizure freedom. Any postoperative changes in neuropsychological performance were based on data one year after surgery. Both univariate statistical analysis (-test and chi-squared test) and stepwise forward and backward Wald test multivariate logistic regression used SPSS software.

3. Results

Out of 26 lesional NTLE patients who underwent lesionectomy, ALTL, and hippocampectomy, 14 patients in the mesial ECoG group underwent EHG-guided mesial resection while 12 patients underwent unguided mesial resection in the lateral ECoG group. There were four MRI-occult dual pathology MTS cases, which were equally distributed (two each) among the mesial and lateral ECoG groups. Six surgeries occurred in the nondominant hemisphere (Table 1). Mean absolute hippocampectomy length was 2.2 cm in the mesial ECoG group and 3.1 cm in the lateral ECoG group (, Table 1 and Figure 3). The range of deviation from mean hippocampectomy length was 0.7 cm (0.2 cm–2.3 cm) in the mesial ECoG group and 1.8 cm (0.6 cm–4.9 cm) in the lateral ECoG group (, Table 1 and Figure 3). Regarding secondary outcomes, more patients achieved seizure freedom in the mesial than lateral ECoG group on univariate analysis (86% versus 42%, , Table 2). On univariate analysis of possible confounders of seizure freedom, NTLE+M (lesional invasion of mesial temporal structures) and NTLE+M+E (simultaneous mesial temporal and extratemporal lesional invasion) were additional factors which were also significantly associated with achieving postoperative Engel Class I at time of last follow-up (Table 2). In a forward selection multivariate logistic regression model, the only significant factor was NTLE+M+E, which was negatively associated with seizure freedom (model ). Using a backward selection model, the only significant factor was NTLE+M, which was positively associated with seizure freedom (model ). EHG was not significantly associated with seizure freedom in either multivariate model. Only 6 of 26 patients (2 mesial ECoG and 4 lateral ECoG patients) had longitudinal preoperative and postoperative neuropsychological data (Table 3). While most patients underwent preoperative testing, many did not attend postoperative testing or they were lost to follow-up. Total available longitudinal neuropsychological data were insufficient for statistical analysis.

PtMesial ECoG
(EHG-guided hippocampectomy)
Lateral ECoG
(unguided hippocampectomy)
Lesion location
on MRI
Engel I

17Grid + strip27MDysplasiaNTLE+EYes1.51.1No
25Grid + strip33FDysplasiaNTLE+M+ENo53.1No
26Grid + strip32MNTLE+M+EYes81.07Yes

Dysplasia, Heterotopia, and Polymicrogyria; Encephalomalacia and Polymicrogyria; EHG(D): hippocampography using depth electrode; EHG(S): hippocampography using strip electrode; FO: foramen ovale electrode; D: dominant hemisphere; ND: nondominant hemisphere; H: hemispheric dominance based on handedness; W: hemispheric dominance based on Wada test; NTLE+M: neocortical temporal lobe epileptogenic lesion with mesial temporal invasion; NTLE+E: neocortical temporal lobe epileptogenic lesion with extratemporal invasion; NTLE+M+E: neocortical temporal lobe epileptogenic lesion with mesial temporal and extratemporal invasion.

Mesial ECoG
(EHG-guided hippocampectomy)
Lateral ECoG
(unguided hippocampectomy)
Group differences 
p (univariate)
Association with Engel I 
p (univariate)

Primary outcome
 Hippocampectomy variability (deviation from mean, cm)0.7 (0.2–2.3)1.8 (0.6–4.9)0.01n/a
Secondary outcomes
 Absolute hippocampectomy length (cm)2.2 (1–4.5)3.1 (0.5–8)0.200.74
 Engel Class I12 (86%)5 (42%)0.02n/a
Possible confounders of secondary outcome Engel Class I
 Age31.8 (7–66)37.8 (18–74)0.360.64
 Male gender8 (57%)6 (50%)0.720.48
 Comorbid MTS6 (43%)6 (50%)0.720.34
 NTLE+M7 (50%)1 (8%)0.0510.02
 NTLE+E1 (7%)3 (25%)0.070.96
 NTLE+M+E1 (7%)5 (42%)0.0020.046
 Follow-up duration1.7 (0.03–4.22)2.1 (0.03–4.63)0.400.07

Statistically significant on univariate analysis.
Statistically significant on multivariate analysis: NTLE+M was positively associated with Engel I; NTLE+M+E was negatively associated against Engel I.
NTLE+M: neocortical temporal lobe epileptogenic lesion with mesial temporal invasion; NTLE+E: neocortical temporal lobe epileptogenic lesion with extratemporal invasion; NTLE+M+E: neocortical temporal lobe epileptogenic lesion with mesial temporal and extratemporal invasion; n/a: not applicable.

PtECoGSideHippocampectomy (cm)WAIS3WMS3BNT
FSIQVIQPIQVisual memorySpatial memoryRemind testAuditory verbal processingAuditory logical memoryNamingAuditory naming

10Mesial EHGD2000
11Mesial EHGD2.51
16Lateral StripD1.5750205
19Lateral GridD27025410
20Lateral GridD232500
21Lateral GridD2.512250660

ECoG: electrocorticography; EHG: hippocampography; D: dominant hemisphere; WAIS3: Wechsler adult intelligence scale 3rd edition; FSIQ: full scale intelligence quotient; VIQ: verbal intelligence quotient; PIQ: performance intelligence quotient; WMS3: Wechsler memory scale 3rd edition; BNT: Boston Naming Test.

4. Discussion

Hippocampography (EHG) in lesional NTLE patients guided mesial temporal resection to yield 2.6 times more consistent hippocampectomy than unguided mesial temporal resections in patients who did not undergo EHG. This finding is consistent with our hypothesis that EHG reduces the variability in mesial temporal resection which is inherent with an unguided arbitrary approach. Although hippocampectomy variability was reduced by EHG, there was no significant difference in overall absolute hippocampectomy length between mesial and lateral ECoG groups. This may relate to very conservative and very expansive hippocampectomy outliers in the lateral ECoG group which balanced one another to settle at a mean which was not significantly different from the mesial ECoG group. Reducing hippocampectomy variability, however, to arrive within a tight optimal resection range is critical in balancing the competing goals of maximizing seizure freedom and minimizing postoperative neuropsychological risk. Unnecessarily conservative hippocampal resections risk missing excision of normal-appearing epileptogenic tissue. Unnecessarily expansive hippocampal resections risk greater postoperative neuropsychological deficit. Our study also assessed postoperative seizure freedom and neuropsychological changes as secondary outcomes. On univariate analysis, EHG was associated with greater postoperative seizure freedom. This finding may relate to EHG detection of unremarkable epileptogenic hippocampal tissue otherwise missed on visual inspection. Because most EHG was conducted using depth electrodes, it is also possible that EHG may have inadvertently destroyed epileptogenic hippocampal tissue while sampling it. Unfortunately, we lacked sufficient data to comment on postoperative neuropsychological outcomes. Based on our findings, we conclude that if the decision has been made to include hippocampal resection as part of NTLE surgery, then EHG is a readily applied intraoperative ECoG technique which guides mesial temporal resection to yield the benefits of more consistent hippocampal resection.

These findings are subject to many limitations. First, there is no consensus on a “gold standard” surgery for lesional NTLE. In this study, the standard was pegged to our conventional practice of lateral ECoG using neocortical subdural grid and strip electrodes. Lateral ECoG patients formed the “control” unguided hippocampectomy group against which the “test” EHG-guided hippocampectomy group was compared. Although lateral ECoG may not be “gold standard,” our results, however, are applicable to any institution-specific “conventional” ECoG practice which does not guide mesial temporal resection. Another limitation of this study is follow-up duration. Although this factor was not found to be a significant confounder of postoperative seizure freedom in either univariate or multivariate analysis, the follow-up duration for Engel Class I patients was less than one year in 7 of 17 patients, which was equally distributed between the mesial and lateral ECoG groups. This suggests caution in the interpretation of seizure freedom durability in either ECoG group. Limitations also apply to study outcomes. Regarding hippocampectomy length (a one-dimensional measurement), it is possible that there may have been a relationship between hippocampectomy volume (a three-dimensional construct) and EHG. Unfortunately, volumetric data were not available from surgical reports and we were unable to perform detailed volumetry on postoperative MRI of lesionectomy and ALTL. Regarding the secondary outcome of postoperative seizure freedom, NTLE patients who underwent EHG may have “converted” to the better prognosis of MTLE as a result of selection bias which favored EHG where the temporal neocortical lesion was close to the mesial temporal region, invaded into the mesial temporal region or, there was dual pathology MTS (“NTLE+M”). On the other hand, lateral ECoG without EHG was favored when the lesion was close to, or extended into, the adjacent extratemporal region (“NTLE+E”). These lateral ECoG cases may have “converted” to the worse prognosis of extratemporal epilepsy (NTLE+E). However, some recent studies did not find a difference in seizure freedom between MTLE and NTLE [1, 14]. The historical difference in outcome has been attributed to poor patient selection, poor localization, and incomplete neocortical lesionectomy [1520]. Regarding the secondary outcome of postoperative neuropsychological outcome, we did not have adequate test data to perform formal statistical analysis. While most patients experienced postoperative declines, especially on the Boston Naming Test, there were select patients who achieved better scores in visual memory and auditory logical memory. Nevertheless, there were insufficient data from which to draw strong conclusions on postoperative neuropsychological outcomes.

While we found that EHG tailored more consistent mesial temporal resections in lesional NTLE to significantly reduce hippocampectomy variability when compared to surgeries using ECoG with unguided hippocampectomy, we were unable to directly correlate reduced resection variability with either secondary outcome of improved seizure freedom and/or less neuropsychological deficit. Further elucidating the impact of consistent EHG-guided resections on seizure freedom and neuropsychological outcome depends on larger numbers of patients in a future randomized controlled trial from different institutions with extended follow-up periods and equal numbers of patients undergoing surgeries in the dominant and nondominant hemispheres. These NTLE patients should have more uniform and “pure” lesion locations confined to the temporal neocortex, as verified by dedicated volumetry, which can also precisely delineate anatomical boundaries and resection extents. All patients should have preoperative and postoperative neuropsychological testing at standardized times with standardized neuropsychological metrics. We hope that the findings from our study help inspire such a trial in order to rigorously assess the important yet unanswered issue of what constitutes the “gold standard” surgery in NTLE. Data from a future trial may also help elucidate the unique potential of EHG in striking an ideal balance that maximizes seizure freedom and minimizes neuropsychological deficit in dominant hemispheric cases of lesional NTLE.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


The authors are grateful to Mr. Paul Cartledge, Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, for assistance with statistical analysis and modelling.


  1. J. Schramm, T. Kral, T. Grunwald, and I. Blümcke, “Surgical treatment for neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy: clinical and surgical aspects and seizure outcome,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Engel Jr., S. Wiebe, J. French et al., “Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy,” Epilepsia, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 741–751, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. S. Berger, S. Ghatan, M. M. Haglund, J. Dobbins, and G. A. Ojemann, “Low-grade gliomas associated with intractable epilepsy: seizure outcome utilizing electrocorticography during tumor resection,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. G. Mueller, K. D. Laxer, N. Cashdollar, R. C. Lopez, and M. W. Weiner, “Spectroscopic evidence of hippocampal abnormalities in neocortical epilepsy,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 256–260, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Wagner, M. Uherek, S. Horstmann et al., “Memory outcome after hippocampus sparing resections in the temporal lobe,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 630–636, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. J. Hamberger, W. T. Seidel, R. R. Goodman, and G. M. McKhann II, “Does cortical mapping protect naming if surgery includes hippocampal resection?” Annals of Neurology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 345–352, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Kuruvilla and R. Flink, “Intraoperative electrocorticography in epilepsy surgery: useful or not?” Seizure, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 577–584, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. B. MacDonald and N. Pillay, “Intraoperative electrocorticography in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery,” The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, vol. 27, supplement 1, pp. S85–S91, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. J. Englot and E. F. Chang, “Rates and predictors of seizure freedom in resective epilepsy surgery: an update,” Neurosurgical Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 389–404, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W.-H. Hu, M. Ge, K. Zhang, F.-G. Meng, and J.-G. Zhang, “Seizure outcome with surgical management of epileptogenic ganglioglioma: a study of 55 patients,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 154, no. 5, pp. 855–861, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Nakase, K. Tamura, Y.-J. Kim, H. Hirabayashi, T. Sakaki, and T. Hoshida, “Long-term follow-up outcome after surgical treatment for lesional temporal lobe epilepsy,” Neurological Research, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 588–593, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Upchurch, J. M. Stern, N. Salamon et al., “Epileptogenic temporal cavernous malformations: operative strategies and postoperative seizure outcomes,” Seizure, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 120–128, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Engel Jr., P. C. Van Ness, and T. B. Rasmussen, “Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures,” in Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies, J. Engel, Ed., pp. 609–621, Raven Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  14. L. Maillard, J.-P. Vignal, M. Gavaret et al., “Semiologic and electrophysiologic correlations in temporal lobe seizure subtypes,” Epilepsia, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1590–1599, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Hajek, A. Antonini, K. L. Leenders, and H. G. Wieser, “Mesiobasal versus lateral temporal lobe epilepsy: metabolic differences in the temporal lobe shown by interictal 18F-FDG positron emission tomography,” Neurology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 79–86, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. V. Pacia, O. Devinsky, K. Perrine et al., “Clinical features of neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 724–730, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. S. Spencer, D. D. Spencer, P. D. Williamson, and R. Mattson, “Combined depth and subdural electrode investigation in uncontrolled epilepsy,” Neurology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 74–79, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. Bercovici, B. S. Kumar, and S. M. Mirsattari, “Neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy,” Epilepsy Research and Treatment, vol. 2012, Article ID 103160, 15 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. D. Kennedy and S. U. Schuele, “Neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy,” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 366–370, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. J. O'Brien, C. Kilpatrick, V. Murrie, S. Vogrin, K. Morris, and M. J. Cook, “Temporal lobe epilepsy caused by mesial temporal sclerosis and temporal neocortical lesions. A clinical and electroencephalographic study of 46 pathologically proven cases,” Brain, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 2133–2141, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Marcus C. Ng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.