Pore Structure and Fluid Uptake of the Springer/Goddard Shale Formation in Southeastern Oklahoma, USA
Table 1
Basic information of Springer shale samples.
Sample ID
Well
Depth (ft/m)
TOC (%)a
Vitrinite reflectance Ro(%)b
Lithofaciesc
Quartz (%)
Albite (%)
Calcite (%)
Dolomite/ankerite (%)
Pyrite (%)
Donpeacorite (%)
Illite (%)
Muscovite (%)
Kaolinite (%)
A-12847
A
12847/3886.2
4.62
2.51 ± 0.892 ()
Mixed siliceous mudstone
51.1
6.9
7.1
3.3
3.4
2.5
11.4
10.3
4.1
A-12871
12871/3893.5
3.84
2.32 ± 0.868 ()
Clay-rich siliceous mudstone
60.4
12.2
4.0
19.4
4.0
B-12946
B
12946/3916.1
6.74
2.16 ± 1.10 ()
B-13010
13010/3935.5
2.79
2.72 ± 0.925 ()
Clay-rich siliceous mudstone
67.9
6.7
3.3
19.1
3.0
B-13047
13047/3946.7
7.91
2.58 ± 0.879 ()
Silica-dominated lithotype
89.6
1.9
8.5
aDetermined by following the standard method SY/T 5116-1997 in China. bMeasured from the intensity of reflected light from polished vitrinite particles by following the standard method SY/T 5124-2012 in China; the number of observations is listed in parentheses. cFrom a mineralogy ternary diagram of sCore lithofacies classification scheme for organic mudstones proposed by Gamero-Diaz et al. [74].