Research Article
A Comparison of Simplified Modelling Approaches for Performance Assessment of Piles Subjected to Lateral Spreading of Liquefied Ground
Table 2
Liquefaction potential assessment of the site of case study.
| Depth (m) | Soil type | FC (%) | SPT-N | | | |
| 1.00 | Fill | 10.0 | 8 | 17.9 | 2.15 | ─ | 2.00 | Fill | 10.0 | 4 | 6.3 | 0.82 | 0.2 | 3.00 | Fill | 10.0 | 1 | 1.4 | 0.53 | 0 | 4.00 | Fill | 10.0 | 2 | 2.6 | 0.53 | 0 | 5.00 | Fill | 10.0 | 10 | 11.9 | 0.82 | 0.2 | 6.00 | Fill | 10.0 | 9 | 10.1 | 0.71 | 0.1 | 7.00 | Fill | 10.0 | 15 | 15.8 | 1.14 | ─ | 8.00 | Fill | 10.0 | 8 | 8.0 | 0.61 | 0.1 | 9.00 | Sand | 10.0 | 14 | 13.3 | 0.86 | 0.2 | 10.00 | Sand | 10.0 | 23 | 21.0 | 2.51 | ─ | 11.00 | Sand | 10.0 | 24 | 21.0 | 2.54 | ─ | 12.00 | Sandy silt | 60.0 | 3 | 2.6 | N.L. | ─ | 13.00 | Sandy silt | 60.0 | 3 | 2.5 | N.L. | ─ | 14.00 | Sandy silt | 60.0 | 4 | 3.3 | N.L. | ─ | 15.00 | Sandy silt | 60.0 | 4 | 3.2 | N.L. | ─ | 16.00 | Sandy silt | 60.0 | 16 | 12.4 | N.L. | ─ | 17.00 | Gravelly sand | 0.0 | 42 | 31.7 | 6.29 | ─ | 18.00 | Gravelly sand | 0.0 | 46 | 33.8 | 9.47 | ─ | 19.00 | Sand | 0.0 | 38 | 27.2 | 2.76 | ─ | 20.00 | Gravelly sand | 0.0 | 50 | 34.9 | 12.0 | ─ |
|
|