Research Article
Environmental Evaluation of Coal Mines Based on Generalized Linear Model and Nonlinear Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy
Table 11
The priorities of risk factors to the coal mine.
| Factors | Local weight | Global weight | Ranking |
| Soil quality C1 | | 0.6655 | I | Concentration of coal C1-1 | 0.4521 | 0.3009 | 1 | Concentration of lead C1-2 | 0.1481 | 0.0986 | 4 | Concentration of cadmium C1-3 | 0.1827 | 0.1215 | 3 | Concentration of zinc C1-4 | 0.1085 | 0.0722 | 6 | Concentration of arsenic C1-5 | 0.1086 | 0.0723 | 5 | Water environmental quality C2 | | 0.2293 | II | Concentration of Pb C2-1 | 0.7002 | 0.1606 | 2 | Concentration of Zn C2-2 | 0.1339 | 0.0308 | 8 | Concentration of COD C2-3 | 0.1060 | 0.0242 | 9 | Concentration of BOB C2-4 | 0.0599 | 0.0137 | 11 | Atmospheric environment C3 | | 0.0679 | III | Concentration of TSP C3-1 | 0.7754 | 0.0526 | 7 | Concentration of CO C3-2 | 0.1871 | 0.0127 | 12 | Concentration of SO2 C3-3 | 0.0322 | 0.0022 | 15 | Concentration of radon C3-4 | 0.0053 | 0.0004 | 16 | Ecological compensation indicators C6 | | 0.0373 | IV | Input intensity of pollution control C6-1 | 0.3790 | 0.0141 | 10 | Perfection of ecological early warning mechanism C6-2 | 0.3313 | 0.0124 | 13 | Proportion of environmental protection input to mine income C6-3 | 0.2896 | 0.0108 | 14 |
|
|