Research Article

A Dynamic Risk Assessment Method for Deep-Buried Tunnels Based on a Bayesian Network

Table 6

Nodes and node ranges.

NodesNode range

A1 section sizeMediumLarge
A2 construction methodCenter diagram method (CD)Bench cut method (BCM)Ring cut method (RCM)Full face excavation method (FFEM)Center cross diagram method (CRD)
A3 tunnel depth<15 m15~25 m>25 m
A4 surrounding rock levelIVVVI
A5 groundwaterNo waterWater leakingWater gushing
A6 mud inrushNo mudMud leakingMud inrush
A7 prereinforcement effectsGoodMediumPoor
A8 support timingIn timeLate
A9 construction qualityGoodMediumPoor
A10 construction experienceWell experiencedMediumInexperienced
A11 construction managementStrictMediumPoor
A12 support strengthHighMediumLow
A13 inner-tunnel observationNormalSlight cracksSlip off
A14 arch crown convergenceIIIIII
A15 side wall displacementIIIIII
B1 objective factor ratingIIIIII
B2 subjective factor ratingIIIIII
B3 monitoring factor ratingIIIIII
C1 dynamic risk ratingIIIIII