Geofluids

Geofluids / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Advances in Rock Mass Structural Geomechanics Related to Hydro-Mechanical Effects

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 3686852 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3686852

Baojian Li, Gang Lei, Panpan Guo, Gaoyun Zhou, Zhe Wang, Xiaonan Gong, "Experimental Investigation into Limit Void Ratio Characteristics of Calcareous Sands considering Various Factors", Geofluids, vol. 2021, Article ID 3686852, 9 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3686852

Experimental Investigation into Limit Void Ratio Characteristics of Calcareous Sands considering Various Factors

Academic Editor: Yu Wang
Received14 May 2021
Accepted15 Jun 2021
Published25 Jun 2021

Abstract

Relative density is an important index affecting the mechanical behaviors of calcareous sands. The dense sands present softening strength, whereas the loose sands exhibit hardening strength. Furthermore, the relative density is determined based on the maximum and minimum void ratios obtained by using the maximum and minimum dry density test. In this study, a series of tests were carried out on various mixed graded sands to explore their material properties and the relationship between the limit void ratio, considering the effects of test methods, equipment, and fine content. It is shown that a more accurate maximum void ratio can be attained by using the 1000 mL measuring cylinder with low rotation speed. In addition, in order to avoid particle breakage of calcareous sands, it is suggested that the minimum void ratio should be obtained with the 1000 mL compaction cylinder combining vibration with hit. The results also show that a linear relationship exists among the limit void ratio of various mixed graded sands. Besides, the void ratio is significantly affected by the fine content. 40% is the critical fine content corresponding to the lowest value of the limit void ratio.

1. Introduction

Calcareous sands are special soils, which are biogenic sediments and skeletal remains of marine organisms. The main composition is calcium carbonate with a lower hardness than silica sands [16]. They are widely distributed in shallow, warm, and continental shelf seas. Calcareous sands are characterized by high crushability, irregular particle shape, high intraparticle void, and complex microstructure. Therefore, their mechanical behaviors are quite different from that of terrigenous sands [710]. With the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative, calcareous sands have been a topic of interest among geotechnical researchers recently. However, they tend to concern particle shape and breakage [1113], biocementation [1416], and bearing capacity of pile foundations [1719]. There are few papers on maximum and minimum void ratios and relative density of calcareous sands.

Relative density, , is a crucial indicator reflecting the compactness of noncohesive soil, which has been proposed and widely used by domestic and foreign scholars since the 1940s [20]. It is a state parameter indicating how dense a given sand sample or deposit is with respect to its range of possible densities. It has a governing influence on strength and stability of sand in filling engineering, such as embankment, retaining wall, and ground improvement [2123]. Nevertheless, the determination of the maximum and minimum void ratios is the prerequisite for calculating the relative density. Two parameters, and , cannot be directly measured and must be determined by the maximum and minimum dry densities of sand. Generally, the minimum dry density is often measured by the funnel methods or the measuring cylinder method, and the maximum dry density is usually measured by the vibration-hammer method [24, 25].

Experimental research shows that the main factors affecting the maximum and minimum dry densities of sand are particle shape, uniformity coefficient, fine content, instrument size, test method, and so on. The formula for calculating the maximum and minimum dry densities of noncohesive soil is proposed, considering compaction power, particle composition and shape, and particle filling [2628]. Unfortunately, the result is far from satisfactory, because of idealized assumptions. Meanwhile, some improved methods are found to measure the maximum and minimum dry densities of terrigenous sands [29, 30]. Previous researches mainly focus on clean sand. In particular, characteristics of and have been studied in the context of applicability and accuracy of the relative density. Other studies have investigated the relation between the material properties and of sand. Recently, effects of fines on the limit void ratio () have been a new theme to examine the influence of fines on the physical and mechanical properties of quartz sands among geotechnical scholars [3134]. A large number of test data on silty sand were examined, and a set of empirical equations were proposed to show the effect of fine content on the minimum void ratio [35]. Apart from these studies, computer simulation analyses using the discrete element method have also been carried out to study the characteristics of the limit void ratio of particle mixtures. The trend of computer simulation results resembles that obtained from experimental tests [3638].

Above all, compared to the number of studies on mechanical behaviors of calcareous sands and influence factors of relative density, the impact on the relative density of test methods and fine content of calcareous sands is rather limited. In the present study, we aim to examine the void ratio characteristics for calcareous sands including clean sands and sands containing a small amount of fine-size particles ( mm). Specifically, the study highlights the influence of test methods and equipment on . In what follows, binary relationships between the maximum and minimum void ratios are obtained. The results supplement the relevant provisions of the national regulations, which can improve the availability of the laboratory test.

2. Idealized Packing of Spherical Grains

Analyzing the idealized packing of spherical grains is an effective way to understand the characteristics of soil. At the same time, it is suitable for sand to build the physical model based on spherical particles [3943]. For convenience, in theoretical calculation, it was assumed that the sand particle is completely incompressible.

2.1. Single-Size Spheres

For single-size spheres, the loosest possible packing is shown in Figure 1(a), with the corresponding maximum void ratio being calculated according to the following equations: where is the diameter of sand particles and , are the volume of sand, sand particles, and void.

On the other hand, Figure 1(b) displays the void ratio of densest packing. The volume of sand is composed of 3 parts:  = the volume of complete sphere particles,  = the volume of sand embedded in the pores above the first layer and below the sixth layer, and  = the volume of sand embedded in the pores among three balls between the upper and lower sides. The minimum void ratio is computed by Equations (2)–(8). It is obvious from the above results that the maximum and minimum void ratios are independent of the size in the certain number of idealized single-sized spheres:

2.2. Mixtures of Two Grain Sizes

When mixing two spherical particles of different sizes, the packing is influenced by the proportion of large and small particles in the total volume of solids as well as by the relative sizes of the large and small spheres. Figure 2 schematically shows the corresponding change in with the percentage of fine content.

The point expresses the densest packing of the larger spherical particles. At first, adding smaller-size spheres to the densest packing of large spheres results in a decrease in the volume of void for small particles fill in the void among the large particles, which is denoted the filling-of-voids process with the path in the diagram. When the content of small spheres exceeds the threshold percentage corresponding to point , a reverse trend is evident in which the volume of void increases with the percentage of the small-size content. Subsequently, in the so-called replacement-of-solids phase, the large-size spheres are separated and increasingly replaced by the small-size particles until the solid is composed of the smaller particles (point ). So, we can see that decreases during the filling-of-voids phase and reaches its minimum value at a certain percentage . Then, steadily increases in the course of the replacement-of-solids phase, with the path . In practice, the value of is similar to that of since the voids have no concern with the size of spherical particles.

Obviously, of mixtures of two grain sizes may change with the fine content similar to in Figure 2. But the value may be nearly constant or slightly increase with an addition of a very small amount of fines because the small particles do not fill the void formed by the large spheres yet.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Experimental Materials

The sand samples as shown in Figure 3 are biogenic sediments and skeletal remains of marine organisms retrieved from the reef reclamation site in Nansha Island, South China Sea. The total area of coral reef in the South China Sea is about  km2, accounting for 5% of the total amount all around the world [44]. Most of the coral reef is located in the region of Nansha Island in our country. Figure 4 displays the grain size distribution curve of calcareous sands collected from Nansha Island. A natural grading with grain diameter less than 5.0 mm was retained for the test. The physical parameters are shown in Table 1. According to the characteristics of particle sizes, the investigated materials include coarse and medium sand without fine particles. The main reasons are sampling location and construction characteristics of hydraulic filling. In the process of reef reclamation, under the action of hydraulic screening and particle gravity, the coarse sand particle tends to accumulate near the mouth of the reclamation site, while the fine particle tends to accumulate downstream with the flow of water, resulting in the uneven distribution. The sand sample used in this experiment was taken from the shallow surface upstream. Therefore, it is poor distribution without particles below 0.1 mm.


(mm) (mm) (mm)

2.792.600.880.386.840.78

Note.  = specific gravity;  = limited particle size;  = median particle size;  = effective particle size;  = coefficient of uniformity;  = coefficient of curvature.
3.2. The Minimum and Maximum Dry Density Test

As is mentioned above, relative density is an important parameter of sand, which is analyzed by Equation (9). Nevertheless, the limit void ratio is difficult to measure directly and needs to be computed using Equations (10) and (11). Namely, relative density can be obtained by measuring the maximum and minimum dry densities: where is the density of water (kg/m3), is minimum dry density, and is maximum dry density.

The standard [24] suggests that the minimum dry density should be obtained by the funnel method or the measuring cylinder method. The volume of the measuring cylinder is 500 mL or 1000 mL, and the mass of sand samples is 700 g. In order to study the influence of the volume of measuring cylinder and test methods on the minimum dry density, 3 different volume ranges (250, 500, and 1000 mL) were used in the experiment. The sand samples were experimented with by the funnel method (M1), fast measuring cylinder method (M2), and slow measuring cylinder method (M3). The speed of sand falling into the measuring cylinders through funnels was approximately 5g/s. The inversion speeds of measuring cylinders in M2 and M3 were, respectively, 30 s/180° and 60 s/180°. Each group of tests was repeated 3 times, and the average value was taken as the final results.

On the other hand, for the determination of maximum dry density, there is no internationally uniform method. China geotechnical engineers often use the vibration-hammer method. During the test, the sand samples were compacted and hammered to obtain the idealized maximum dry density. In order to analyze the influence of test equipment on maximum dry density, the compaction cylinder with a volume of 250 and 1000 mL was selected for layered compaction. When sand samples reached a constant value, the mass was weighed and the corresponding maximum dry density was calculated. Similarly, every experiment was conducted 3 times, and the average value was considered the final results.

3.3. Test on the Relationship between the Maximum and Minimum Void Ratios

It is well known that maximum and minimum void ratios of sand are evaluated from laboratory tests through two independent test methods for the minimum and maximum dry densities, respectively. But previous studies have reported that a linear correlation was derived to express the relationship between of terrigenous sands [45]. For the sake of exploring the relationship of calcareous sands, the experimental sand samples of various distributions were mixed at random. 20 groups of sand with diverse grading indexes shown in Figure 5 were configured.

3.4. Test on the Influence of Fine Content on the Limit Void Ratio

Fine contents are a critical factor affecting the void ratio of sand. For a further study, calcareous sands were mixed with 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% of fine particles to produce 10 groups with diverse grain compositions. The following was determining the minimum and maximum dry densities and computing the limit void ratio. Before the test, sand was washed with clean water to remove fine and clay particles on the surface and in the inner pore of large particles.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. The Effects of Test Methods and Equipment on Maximum and Minimum Void Ratios

Before exploring the maximum and minimum void ratios of sand, it is necessary to address several important issues related to the determination procedures and applicability of minimum and maximum dry densities. According to the funnel method and measuring cylinder method to estimate minimum dry density of calcareous sands, the maximum void ratio was acquired. The results in Figure 6 indicate that the value of the funnel method was the largest, followed by the fast measuring cylinder method, and the slow measuring cylinder method was the smallest in the same volume of measuring cylinder. What is more, the larger the volume, the smaller the void ratio in the similar test method.

It can also be seen that the void ratio measured by the funnel method (M1) was smaller than that of the measuring cylinder methods (M2 and M3), which was caused by the different determination operations. In the process of M1, since the particles dropping from the funnel had a certain falling speed, the void between particles and between the particles and measuring cylinder was small. In particular, due to the limitation of the funnel size, the given large particles almost slowly fall one by one, leading to a tight sand sample. For M3, the entire operation being carried out slowly, it only changed the relative position of particles inside the samples. The void was more than that measured by M1. Besides, different volumes of measuring cylinders had a certain impact on the experimental results. When the volume was smaller, sand particles were more likely to be arranged in layers, which made a higher value of the maximum void ratio. Therefore, we should choose the slow measuring cylinder method and a large volume of measuring cylinder to evaluate the minimum void ratio in the laboratory test. Strangely, the idealized value of the maximum void ratio was unexpectedly lower than the measured one. The main reason is that the natural sand particles are not regular spherical, and there are arching and cavitation inside them during determination procedures. And particles of calcareous sands are rich in the inner pore, displayed in Figure 7 (50 and 2000 magnification times, respectively), simultaneously resulting in the peculiar phenomenon.

Table 2 presents the maximum dry density and minimum void ratio of sand measured by the vibratory hammer method using a compaction cylinder with a volume of 250 and 1000 mL. It is found that under the same condition, the measured minimum void ratio with a volume of 250 mL is significantly lower than that of the 1000 mL compaction cylinder.


(mL) (g) (g/cm3) (g/cm3)

250389.51.5581.5610.780.347
392.51.570
388.71.555
10001503.21.5031.4930.87
1485.11.485
1491.41.491

Note. V = volume of compaction cylinder;  = mass of sand;  = average value of maximum dry density;  = minimum void ratio of idealized single-size spheres.

The grain size distribution curves of calcareous sands before and after vibration hammering are shown in Figure 8. For the 250 mL compaction cylinder, due to the small inner diameter, the compaction energy was more likely to accumulate, making the coarse particles easy to break, which resulted in an increase in the maximum dry density and a decrease in the minimum void ratio. Compaction energy had a significant effect on the crushing of medium and coarse particles. However, the grading curve did not change significantly after being hammered in a compaction cylinder with a volume of 1000 mL. So, for the vibration-hammer method to determine the maximum dry density of sand, in order to be more similar to the given graded sand, it is recommended that a 1000 mL compaction cylinder should be used. In addition, compared with the idealized minimum void ratio, the experimental value converted from the test on maximum dry density was different from the theoretical one. This is because the premise of theoretical calculation is that the sand particles are assumed to have a uniform sphere. The shape of actual sand particles is irregular, and the arrangement is also different.

In summary, the maximum and minimum void ratios of a given sandy soil are not unique, but rather, they rest with the test methods and equipment used to determine them. For this reason, when comparing the limit void ratio of various soils, it is an essential and prerequisite condition that of all soils are measured using the same test procedures (including methods, equipment, and experimental steps) for or , respectively. Although these procedures tend to identify the limited dry density of given sand, it would be difficult to determine the minimum and maximum densities in the true sense.

4.2. A Linear Relationship between Maximum and Minimum Void Ratios

The maximum and minimum dry density test was carried out on these 20 groups of sands. Even though the limit void ratio was obtained from two independent tests that have opposite targets, namely, to produce the loosest state and the densest state of a sand sample, respectively, yet Figure 9 indicates that there is a linear relationship between of the compiled sands evidently. However, when the value of was in a lower range of 0.6 to 0.75, the distribution of was relatively discrete, which made the linear relationship between the maximum and minimum void ratios a little weaker. As the range of increases, of the sand samples became a more and more well-defined relationship. This is consistent with the results of Cubrinovski and Ishihara, Yilmaz, and Muszynaki [35, 41, 46].

4.3. Discussion on Influence of Fine Content on Limit Void Ratio

For each type of composite sands, the maximum and minimum void ratios have been determined according to the above laboratory procedures. Therefore, it is possible to plot the values of as a function of the fine content for each of the composite soils, as shown in Figure 10. It is observed that both initially decreased as the fine content increased from 0% to about 30%. Within the range of 30 to 50% fines, the correlations presented a change of form indicating a transition from the filling-of-voids to the replacement-of-solids process. Above 60% fines, the maximum and minimum void ratios were seen to steadily increase until they eventually reached 100% fine content. It is indicated that the variation of with the fine content in Figure 10 closely resembled that of the spherical particles shown in Figure 2. But of the nature sands without fines were higher than that with 100% fine content, which differed from the idealized values and previous studies [47]. Maybe there are 2 main reasons. On the one hand, the original sands are full of void among particles, leading to poor distribution. Besides, compared with fine fractions, the nature sands without fines are rich in intraparticle voids.

5. Conclusions

A series of data were acquired by the maximum and minimum dry density test on various mixed sand. The main conclusions drawn from this study can be summarized as follows. (1)The maximum and minimum dry density test should adopt the vibration-hammer method and slow measuring cylinder methods, respectively. To avoid the influence of equipment on experimental results, measuring cylinder and compaction cylinder with a volume of 1000 mL should be used(2)An almost linear relationship exists between the maximum and minimum void ratios of various mixed graded sand. The relationship has a high correlation coefficient of 0.9 and can be used to approximately evaluate and vice versa(3)The maximum and minimum void ratios are significantly affected by the fine content in a way that the limit void ratio decreases from 0% to 30% during the filling-of-voids phase and increases within the range of 50% to 100% in the course of the replacement-of-solids phase. Near 40% is a certain percentage showing a change of pattern indicating the transition(4)The maximum and minimum void ratios of a given sandy soil are not unique, but rather they rest with the test methods and equipment used to determine them. Therefore, when comparing the limit void ratio of various soil, it is an essential and prerequisite condition that of all soil are measured using the same test procedures. Besides, the void ratio characteristics should not be regarded as an isolated feature of the packing of sand, but rather, they should be looked upon as the fact that the particle structure is directly reflected in the mechanical properties of sand

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This paper gets its funding from a project (Grant Nos. 51778585 and 5207080379) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Joint Fund of Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation Committee Power China Huadong Engineering Corporation (Grant No. LHZ19E090001).

References

  1. C.-l. Zhu, J.-x. Zhang, N. Zhou, M. Li, and Y.-b. Guo, “Permeability of sand-based cemented backfill under different stress conditions: effects of confining and axial pressures,” Geofluids, vol. 2021, Article ID 6657662, 13 pages, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  2. Z.-h. Yan, C. Cao, M.-y. Xie et al., “Pressure behavior analysis of permeability changes due to sand production in offshore loose sandstone reservoirs using boundary-element method,” Geofluids, vol. 2021, Article ID 6658875, 10 pages, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  3. M. R. Coop, “The mechanics of uncemented carbonate sands,” Géotechnique, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 607–626, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. R. Coop, K. K. Sorensen, T. B. Freitas, and G. Georgoutsos, “Particle breakage during shearing of a carbonate sand,” Géotechnique, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 157–163, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Donohue, C. O’Sullivan, and M. Long, “Particle breakage during cyclic triaxial loading of a carbonate sand,” Géotechnique, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 477–482, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. V. Fioravante, D. Giretti, and M. J. Kowski, “Small strain stiffness of carbonate Kenya sand,” Engineering Geology, vol. 161, pp. 65–80, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. Kong and J. Fonseca, “Quantification of the morphology of shelly carbonate sands using 3D images,” Géotechnique, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 249–261, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Wu, N. Li, X.-z. Wang, and J. Cui, “Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior and particle crushing of calcareous sand retrieved from South China Sea,” Engineering Geology, vol. 280, p. 105932, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Y. Qin, T. Yao, R. Wang, C.-q. Zhu, and Q.-s. Meng, “Particle breakage-based analysis of deformation law of calcareous sediments under high-pressure consolidation,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 3123–3128, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  10. H.-y. Chen, R. Wang, J.-g. Li, and J.-m. Zhang, “Grain shape analysis of calcareous soil,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1389–1392, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  11. S.-j. Rui, Z. Guo, T.-l. Si, and Y.-j. Li, “Effect of particle shape on the liquefaction resistance of calcareous sands,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 137, article 106302, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  12. Y.-r. Lv, X. Li, and Y. Wang, “Particle breakage of calcareous sand at high strain rates,” Powder Technology, vol. 366, pp. 776–787, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Peng, X.-m. Ding, Y. Zhang, C.-l. Wang, and C. Y. Wang, “Evaluation of the particle breakage of calcareous sand based on the detailed probability of grain survival: an application of repeated low-energy impacts,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 141, article 106497, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  14. L. Wang, X. Jiang, X. He et al., “Crackling noise and bio-cementation,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 247, article 107675, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Oualha, S. Bibi, M. Sulaiman, and N. Zouari, “Microbially induced calcite precipitation in calcareous soils by endogenous Bacillus cereus, at high pH and harsh weather,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 257, article 109965, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. T. O'Donnell and E. K. Jr, “Stiffness and dilatancy improvements in uncemented sands treated through MICP,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental, vol. 141, article 02815004, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. D. Murff, “Pile capacity in calcareous sands: state if the art,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 490–507, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. B. R. Danzigier, A. M. Costa, F. R. Lopes, and M. P. Pacheco, “Back analysis of offshore pile driving with an improved soil model,” Géotechnique, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 777–799, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Jiang, R. Wang, Y.-h. Lv, and Q.-s. Meng, “Test study of model pile in calcareous sands,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 780–784, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  20. F. Tavenas and P. Rochelle, “Accuracy of relative density measurements,” Géotechnique, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 549–562, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Guo, F. Liu, G. Lei et al., “Predicting response of constructed tunnel to adjacent excavation with dewatering,” Geofluids, vol. 2021, Article ID 5548817, 17 pages, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  22. P. Guo, X. Gong, and Y. Wang, “Displacement and force analyses of braced structure of deep excavation considering unsymmetrical surcharge effect,” Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 113, p. 103102, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Guo, X. Gong, Y. Wang, H. Lin, and Y. Zhao, “Minimum cover depth estimation for underwater shield tunnels,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 115, p. 104027, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. GB/T 50123—2019, Standard for Soil Test Method, pp. 48–50, 2019.
  25. B. Das and K. Sobhan, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, Cengage Learning, 2010.
  26. H. W. Humprhes, “A method for controlling compaction of granular materials,” Highway Research Board Bulletin, vol. 159, pp. 41–57, 1957. View at: Google Scholar
  27. Q.-g. Guo and Z.-c. Liu, “Approximation of maximum density of coarse-grained soils,” Water Resources & Water Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  28. Y. Wang, C. H. Li, and J. Q. Han, “On the effect of stress amplitude on fracture and energy evolution of pre- flawed granite under uniaxial increasing-amplitude fatigue loads,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 240, p. 107366, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M.-h. Fan and D.-z. Kong, “Improvement on method for relative density of sand experiments,” Rock and Mineral Analysis, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 67-68, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. Li, D.-y. Li, and Y.-g. Gao, “Determination of maximum and minimum void ratios of sands and their influence factors,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 554–561, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  31. D. C. Bobei, S. R. Lo, D. Wanatowski, C. T. Gnanendran, and M. M. Rahman, “Modified state parameter for characterizing static liquefaction of sand with fines,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 281–295, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. A. Stamatopoulos, “An experimental study of the liquefaction strength of silty sands in terms of the state parameter,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 662–678, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. S. Chang and M. Meidani, “Dominant grains network and behavior of sand-silt mixtures: stress-strain modeling,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods, vol. 37, no. 15, pp. 2563–2589, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Ekinci, M. Hanafi, and P. M. V. Ferreira, “Influence of initial void ratio on critical state behaviour of poorly graded fine sands,” Indian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 689–699, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Cubrinovski and K. Ishihara, “Maximum and minimum void ratio characteristics of sands,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 65–78, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. X.-z. An, “Densification of the packing structure under vibrations,” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 499–503, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. K. Dash, T. G. Sitharam, and B. A. Baudet, “Influence of non-plastic fines on the response of a silty sand to cyclic loading,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 695–704, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. S. Chang, J. Y. Wang, and L. Ge, “Modeling of minimum void ratio for sand-silt mixtures,” Engineering Geology, vol. 196, pp. 293–304, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. K. Mcgeary, “Mechanical packing of spherical particles,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 513–522, 1961. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. B. Aberg, “Void ratio of noncohesive soils and similar materials,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 1315–1334, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. Yilmaz, “A study on the limit void ratio characteristics of medium to fine mixed graded sands,” Engineering Geology, vol. 104, no. 3-4, pp. 290–294, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y. Wang, Y. F. Yi, C. H. Li, and J. Q. Han, “Anisotropic fracture and energy characteristics of a Tibet marble exposed to multi-level constant-amplitude (MLCA) cyclic loads: a lab-scale testing,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 244, p. 107550, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. S. Chang and J. Y. Wang, “Maximum and minimum void ratios for sand-silt mixtures,” Engineering Geology, vol. 211, pp. 7–18, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. Dong, Y. Liu, C. Hu, and B. Xu, “Coral reef geomorphology of the Spratly Islands: a simple method based on time-series of Landsat-8 multi-band inundation maps,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 157, pp. 137–154, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Cubrinovski and K. Ishihara, “Empirical correlation between SPT _N-_ value and relative density for sandy soils,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 61–71, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. R. Muszynaki, “Determination of maximum and minimum density of poorly graded sands using a simplified method,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 263–272, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  47. A. Papadopoulou and T. Tika, “The effect of fines on critical state and liquefaction resistance characteristics of non-plastic silty sands,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 713–725, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Baojian Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views441
Downloads581
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.