Research Article
Quantitative Method for Evaluating Shale Oil Resources Based on Movable Oil Content
Table 2
Original hydrocarbon content, loss amount, and loss rate with conventional pyrolysis of closed core and wellhead cuttings.
| No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Well | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | Depth (m) | 3365.9 | 3353.7 | 3359.3 | 3355.7 | 3351.0 | 3342.5 | 3376.4 | 3339.5 | 3347.0 | 3346.0 | 3344.5 | 3352.7 | TOC (%) | 1.02 | 0.67 | 1.71 | 2.28 | 1.84 | 2.98 | 2.40 | 5.66 | 3.25 | 2.06 | 2.46 | 3.84 | Core (mg/g) | 0.34 | 0.60 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 1.14 | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 1.79 | Cutting (mg/g) | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.08 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 1.27 | 1.03 | Loss (mg/g) | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.71 | 0.40 | 0.76 | Loss ratio (%) | 11.8 | 35.9 | 32.6 | 25.2 | 16.0 | 44.1 | 11.3 | 26.0 | 29.8 | 43.6 | 24.1 | 42.3 | N.O | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | Average | Well | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | G25 | | Depth (m) | 3374.4 | 3367.9 | 3369.9 | 3351.6 | 3377.4 | 3375.4 | 3363.3 | 3366.9 | 3361.3 | 3356.7 | 3345.0 | | TOC (%) | 4.69 | 1.85 | 3.29 | 7.29 | 2.96 | 3.46 | 3.53 | 4.66 | 6.56 | 5.97 | 5.72 | | Core (mg/g) | 1.87 | 1.92 | 2.73 | 2.98 | 3.12 | 3.38 | 3.56 | 3.75 | 4.48 | 4.52 | 6.84 | 2.30 | Cutting (mg/g) | 1.02 | 0.91 | 2.33 | 2.43 | 1.77 | 2.31 | 2.67 | 3.16 | 3.97 | 2.38 | 4.89 | 1.63 | Loss (mg/g) | 0.85 | 1.01 | 1.40 | 1.55 | 1.35 | 1.07 | 1.89 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 2.14 | 1.95 | 0.67 | Loss ratio (%) | 45.4 | 52.7 | 14.6 | 18.4 | 43.3 | 31.7 | 24.9 | 15.9 | 11.3 | 47.3 | 28.5 | 29.4 |
|
|