Research Article
Thermal Environment and Energy Performance of a Typical Classroom Building in a Hot-Humid Region: A Case Study in Guangzhou, China
Table 5
Window materials of cases 26 to 37.
| Case | Window type | Total solar transmission | Light transmission | value |
| Original case | Single-glaze (clear) | 0.86 | 0.9 | 5.9 | Case 16 | Single-glaze (low-E) | 0.63 | 0.8 | 3.40 | Case 17 | Single-glaze (low-E) | 0.42 | 0.68 | 3.16 | Case 18 | Single-glaze (low-E) | 0.37 | 0.75 | 3.05 | Case 19 | Double-glaze (low-E) | 0.65 | 0.72 | 2.00 | Case 20 | Double-glaze (low-E) | 0.38 | 0.62 | 1.90 | Case 21 | Double-glaze (low-E) | 0.33 | 0.68 | 1.84 | Case 22 | Triple-glaze (low-E) | 0.45 | 0.59 | 1.49 | Case 23 | Triple-glaze (low-E) | 0.35 | 0.56 | 1.44 | Case 24 | Triple-glaze (low-E) | 0.31 | 0.62 | 1.40 | Case 25 | Triple-glaze (low-E) | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.97 | Case 26 | Triple-glaze (low-E) | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.89 | Case 27 | Triple-glaze (low-E) | 0.3 | 0.61 | 0.88 |
|
|