A Novel Continuous Fracture Network Model: Formation Mechanism, Numerical Simulation, and Field Application

Table 5

Comparison of prediction results of well TP12-06 by different technologies.

Cluster	Fracture length			Fracture width			Azimuth (°)
	Microseismic monitoring (m)	Simulation result (m)	Error (%)	Microseismic monitoring (m)	Simulation result (m)	Error (%)
1	372	384.47	3.35	142	134.67	5.16	71
2	304	317.83	4.55	151	142.89	5.37	33
3	291	302.58	3.98	193	181.49	5.96	49
4	302	309.59	2.51	201	191.73	4.61	36
5	332	343.72	3.53	143	136.64	4.45	56
6	314	326.39	3.94	210	191.82	8.66	56
Average			3.64			5.70