Research Article
A Novel Continuous Fracture Network Model: Formation Mechanism, Numerical Simulation, and Field Application
Table 5
Comparison of prediction results of well TP12-06 by different technologies.
| Cluster | Fracture length | Fracture width | Azimuth (°) | Microseismic monitoring (m) | Simulation result (m) | Error (%) | Microseismic monitoring (m) | Simulation result (m) | Error (%) |
| 1 | 372 | 384.47 | 3.35 | 142 | 134.67 | 5.16 | 71 | 2 | 304 | 317.83 | 4.55 | 151 | 142.89 | 5.37 | 33 | 3 | 291 | 302.58 | 3.98 | 193 | 181.49 | 5.96 | 49 | 4 | 302 | 309.59 | 2.51 | 201 | 191.73 | 4.61 | 36 | 5 | 332 | 343.72 | 3.53 | 143 | 136.64 | 4.45 | 56 | 6 | 314 | 326.39 | 3.94 | 210 | 191.82 | 8.66 | 56 | Average | | | 3.64 | | | 5.70 | |
|
|