Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 289135, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/289135
Case Report

Successful Nonsurgical Treatment of Pneumomediastinum, Pneumothorax, Pneumoperitoneum, Pneumoretroperitoneum, and Subcutaneous Emphysema following ERCP

1Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Department of Internal Medicine, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA
2Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA

Received 9 February 2010; Revised 16 April 2010; Accepted 19 April 2010

Academic Editor: Mohamad A. Eloubeidi

Copyright © 2010 L. Fujii et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. S. McCune, P. E. Shorb, and H. Moscovitz, “Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 167, no. 5, pp. 752–756, 1968. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Andriulli, S. Loperfido, G. Napolitano et al., “Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 1781–1788, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. L. Silviera, M. J. Seamon, B. Porshinsky et al., “Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review,” Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Loperfido, G. Angelini, G. Benedetti et al., “Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. L. Freeman, D. B. Nelson, S. Sherman et al., “Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335, no. 13, pp. 909–918, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. B. Cotton, G. Lehman, J. Vennes et al., “Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 383–393, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Aliperti, “Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 379–407, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Knudson, C. D. Raeburn, R. C. McIntyre Jr. et al., “Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 196, no. 6, pp. 975–982, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Fatima, T. H. Baron, M. D. Topazian et al., “Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 142, no. 5, pp. 448–455, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Stapfer, R. R. Selby, S. C. Stain et al., “Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 232, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. J. Howard, T. Tan, G. A. Lehman et al., “Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy,” Surgery, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 658–665, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Enns, M. A. Eloubeidi, K. Mergener et al., “ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management,” Endoscopy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 293–298, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Z. Mao, Q. Zhu, W. Wu et al., “Duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: experience and management,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 691–695, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. V. Avgerinos, O. H. Llaguna, A. Y. Lo, J. Voli, and I. M. Leitman, “Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 833–838, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. H. Kim, B. M. Yoo, J. H. Kim, M. W. Kim, and W. H. Kim, “Management of ERCP-related perforations: outcomes of single institution in Korea,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 13, pp. 728–734, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Y. Scarlett and G. L. Falk, “The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 843–846, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. H. E. Lai and W. Y. Lau, “Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography—related perforation,” Surgeon, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Assalia, A. Suissa, A. Ilivitzki et al., “Validity of clinical criteria in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related duodenal perforations,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 142, no. 11, pp. 1059–1064, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. H. de Vries, L. E. M. Duijm, W. Dekker, G. L. Guit, J. Ferwerda, and E. T. Scholten, “CT before and after ERCP: detection of pancreatic pseudotumor, asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforation, and duodenal diverticulum,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 231–235, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. L. Genzlinger, M. S. McPhee, J. K. Fisher, K. M. Jacob, and J. H. Helzberg, “Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1267–1270, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. A. Kirschner, “Porous diaphragm syndromes,” Chest Surgery Clinics of North America, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 449–472, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Ciaccia, M. S. Branch, and J. Baillie, “Pneumomediastinum after endoscopic sphincterotomy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 475–477, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. J. Maunder, D. J. Pierson, and L. D. Hudson, “Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 144, no. 7, pp. 1447–1453, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. S. Bharathi, P. Rao, and K. Ghosh, “Iatrogenic duodenal perforations caused by endoscopic biliary stenting and stent migration: an update,” Endoscopy, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1271–1274, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Zissin, M. Shapiro-Feinberg, A. Oscadchy, I. Pomeranz, G. Leichtmann, and B. Novis, “Retroperitoneal perforation during endoscopic sphincterotomy: imaging findings,” Abdominal Imaging, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 279–282, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Alexiou, T. Sakellaridis, N. Sikalias, I. Karanikas, N. Economou, and G. Antsaklis, “Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, and pneumoperitoneum after unsuccessful ERCP: a case report,” Cases Journal, vol. 2, pp. 120–124, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  27. H. M. Wu, E. Dixon, G. R. May, and F. R. Sutherland, “Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review,” HPB, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 393–399, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Ferrara, C. Luigiano, P. Billi, E. Jovine, F. Cinquantini, and N. D'Imperio, “Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, and subcutaneous emphysema after ERCP,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 1398–1401, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. Kayhan, M. Akdoǧan, and B. Şahin, “ERCP subsequent to retroperitoneal perforation caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 833–835, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus