Early Management Experience of Perforation after ERCP

Table 2

The perforations management and mortality in recent literature.

Author	No. of cases	Retroperitoneal perforation (surgery/died)	Peritoneal perforation (surgery/died)	Surgery treatment (%)	Mortality (%)	Died by sepsis
Ercan et al. [7]	24	6 (6/0)	18 (18/9)^*	24 (100)	9 (37.5)	6
Morgan et al. [11]	24	12 (0/0)	12 (10/1)	10 (41.6)	1 (7.1)	1
Fatima et al. [17]	75	41 (0/0)	34 (22/5)	22 (29.3)	5 (6.7)	5
Assalia et al. [18]	22	20 (2/1)	2 (2/0)	4 (18.2)	1 (4.5)	1
Wu et al. [19]	28	25 (5/2)	3 (3/2)	10 (35.7)	4 (14.3)	4
Thomas et al. [20]	40	36 (4/1)	4 (4/1)	8 (20)	2 (5)	2
Total	213	140 (17/4)	73 (59^#/18^§)	78 (36.7)	22 (10.3)	19

^*Having a esophagus perforation. ^§The mortality of peritoneal perforation was more than that of retroperforation perforation (𝑃=0.000, chi square test). ^#The rate of surgery treatment for peritoneal perforation was more than that for retroperforation perforation (𝑃=0.000, chi square test).