Optimized Sedation Improves Colonoscopy Quality Long-Term

Table 2

Individual endoscopist performance in cohort B.

Endoscopist; per Era: 1, 2, and 3	SAR, % (CI)			CCR, % (CI)			CR, % (CI)
	Era 1	Era 2	Era 3	Era 1	Era 2	Era 3	Era 1	Era 2	Era 3
(1)	30.0; (19.3–40.7)			84.3; (75.8–92.8)			4.3; (0–9.1)
(2)	41.0; (36–46)			88.4; (85–92)			4.2; (2–6)
(3)	38.5; (32–45)	60.3^a; (53–67)	(70.6–84.2)	88.0; (83.6–92.4)	93.6; (90.2–97)	97.9^c; (95.6–100)	2.9; (0.6–5.2)	2.0; (0.1–3.9)	0.0^c; (0)
(4)	49.4; (43.4–55.4)	66.8^a; (61.1–72.5)	(84.5–93.1)	90.2; (86.6–93.3)	95.8^a; (93.6–98.2)	97.6^c; (95.5–99.7)	3.0; (0.9–5)	1.2; (0–2.5)	0.0^c; (0)
(5)	40.8; (34.3–47.3)	63.4^a; (57–69.8)		86.7; (82.2–91.2)	91.7; (88–95.4)		2.8; (0.6–5)	1.9; (0.1–3.7)
(6)		75.5; (70.2–80.8)	92.5^b; (89.3–95.7)		89.5; (85.8–93.2)	94.5^b; (91.7–97.3)		1.6; (0.1–3.1)	0.8; (0–1.9)
(7)		55.6; (48.2–63)			79.5; (73.4–85.6)			4.1; (1–7)

: number of colonoscopies; SAR: sedation administration rate; CI: 95% confidence interval; CCR: colonoscopy completion rate; ADR: adenoma detection rate; CR: early complications rate; ^asignificance over Era 1; ^bsignificance over Era 2; ^csignificance of Era 3 over Era 1.