Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 326581, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/326581
Clinical Study

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Low-Volume PEG Solution Plus Ascorbic Acid versus Standard PEG Solution in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

1Department of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan
2Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan
3Department of Medical Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Delhi 110070, India
4Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnosis, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan

Received 9 February 2015; Accepted 2 April 2015

Academic Editor: Miroslav Zavoral

Copyright © 2015 Masahiro Tajika et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. A. Johnson, A. N. Barkun, L. B. Cohen et al., “Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the us multi-society task force on colorectal cancer,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 109, pp. 1528–1545, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Ell, W. Fischbach, R. Keller et al., “A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*),” Endoscopy, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 300–304, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Belsey, O. Epstein, and D. Heresbach, “Systematic review: adverse event reports for oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. R. Davis, C. A. Santa Ana, S. G. Morawski, and J. S. Fordtran, “Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion,” Gastroenterology, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 991–995, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. C. Harewood, M. J. Wiersema, and L. J. Melton III, “A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 3186–3194, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Tajika, Y. Niwa, V. Bhatia et al., “Can mosapride citrate reduce the volume of lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation?” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 727–735, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. X. Wilson, “Regulation of vitamin C transport,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 25, pp. 105–125, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. I. Fujita, Y. Akagi, J. Hirano et al., “Distinct mechanisms of transport of ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic acid in intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-6),” Research Communications in Molecular Pathology and Pharmacology, vol. 107, no. 3-4, pp. 219–231, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Ell, W. Fischbach, H.-J. Bronisch et al., “Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 883–893, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Corporaal, J. H. Kleibeuker, and J. J. Koornstra, “Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1380–1386, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Marmo, G. Rotondano, G. Riccio et al., “Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 313–320, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Matro, A. Shnitser, M. Spodik et al., “Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1954–1961, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. V. Jansen, J. G. Goedhard, B. Winkens, and C. T. van Deursen, “Preparation before colonoscopy,” European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 897–902, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Pontone, R. Angelini, M. Standoli et al., “Low-volume plus ascorbic acid vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 42, pp. 4689–4695, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Valiante, S. Pontone, C. Hassan et al., “A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-L PEG solution plus ascorbic acid vs 4-L PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 224–227, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. M. Kelly, C. Rodgers, N. Patterson, S. G. Jacob, and I. Mainie, “A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 595–601, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Ponchon, C. Boustière, D. Heresbach, H. Hagege, A.-L. Tarrerias, and M. Halphen, “A low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: the NORMO randomised clinical trial,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 820–826, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Gentile, M. D. Rosa, G. Cestaro, and P. Forestieri, “2L PEG plus ascorbic acid versus 4L PEG plus simethicon for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized single-blind clinical trial,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 276–280, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. M. Moon, D. I. Park, Y. G. Choe et al., “Randomized trial of 2-L polyethylene glycol+ascorbic acid versus 4-L polyethylene glycol as bowel cleansing for colonoscopy in an optimal setting,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1223–1228, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. M. Rivas, A. Perez, M. Hernandez, A. Schneider, and F. J. Castro, “Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 30, pp. 10620–10627, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. E. J. Lai, A. H. Calderwood, G. Doros, O. K. Fix, and B. C. Jacobson, “The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 620–625, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Repici, R. Cestari, V. Annese et al., “Randomised clinical trial: low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy—a comparison between two different PEG-based formulations,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 717–724, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. A. Lieberman, D. K. Rex, S. J. Winawer, F. M. Giardiello, D. A. Johnson, and T. R. Levin, “Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the us multi-society task force on colorectal cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 844–857, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. G. Zauber, S. J. Winawer, M. J. O'Brien et al., “Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, no. 8, pp. 687–696, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. K. Rex, T. F. Imperiale, D. R. Latinovich, and L. L. Bratcher, “Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 1696–1700, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. Froehlich, V. Wietlisbach, J.-J. Gonvers, B. Burnand, and J.-P. Vader, “Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 378–384, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. C. Harewood, V. K. Sharma, and P. De Garmo, “Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 76–79, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. V. Chokshi, C. E. Hovis, T. Hollander, D. S. Early, and J. S. Wang, “Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1197–1203, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. V. K. Sharma, S. K. Chockalingham, E. A. Ugheoke et al., “Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 167–171, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Radaelli, G. Meucci, G. Imperiali et al., “High-dose senna compared with conventional peg-es lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 100, no. 12, pp. 2674–2680, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Mishima, Y. Amano, K. Okita et al., “Efficacy of prokinetic agents in improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” Digestion, vol. 77, no. 3-4, pp. 166–172, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Tajika, Y. Niwa, V. Bhatia et al., “Efficacy of mosapride citrate with polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy preparation,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 2517–2525, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Q. Xie, L. Chen, F. Zhao et al., “A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution as bowel preparations for colonoscopy,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 6, Article ID e99092, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. G. Lichtenstein, “Bowel preparations for colonoscopy: a review,” American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, vol. 66, pp. 27–37, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. L. Seinelä, E. Pehkonen, T. Laasanen, and J. Ahvenainen, “Bowel preparation for colonoscopy in very old patients: a randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 216–220, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Bendich and L. Langseth, “The health effects of vitamin C supplementation: a review,” The Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 124–136, 1995, Erratum in The Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 14, p. 218, 1995; The Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 14, p. 398, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  37. J. Blanchard, T. N. Tozer, and M. Rowland, “Pharmacokinetic perspectives on megadoses of ascorbic acid,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1165–1171, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. D. Cohen, C. Keuneke, U. Schiemann et al., “Hyponatraemia as a complication of colonoscopy,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9252, pp. 282–283, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Nyberg, J. Hendel, and O. H. Nielsen, “The safety of osmotically acting cathartics in colonic cleansing,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 557–564, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus