Review Article

Rescue Therapy with a Proton Pump Inhibitor Plus Amoxicillin and Rifabutin for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Characteristics of studies without included meta-analysis.

Study, yearAgeLocationRegimenDuration (day)H. pylori infection diagnosis/recheckingEradication rate by ITTФEradication rate by PPSide effectsDiscountingTherapyMINORS score

Toracchio et al. [22], 2005AdultItalyPRA10RUT and C13-UBTGroup 1: 87.5% (366/420) Group 2: 78.5% (82/104)Group 1: 100% (366/366) Group 2: 82.2% (82/10)1First or second18

Gesbert et al. [23], 2003AdultSpainORA14C13-UBT/C13-UBT79% (11/14)79% (11/14)50Third13

Borody et al. [9], 2006AdultAustraliaLRA12C13-UBT90.8% (118/130)90.8% (118/130)52Second, third, fourth14

González Carro et al. [24], 2007AdultSpainPRA10C13-UBT/C13-UBT61% (55/92)62.20% (55/90)22Third13

Veldhuyzen van Zanten et al. [25], 2010AdultCanada PPI-RA7H, C/H, UBT63% (10/16)67% (10/15)1Rescue9

Perri et al. [26], 2000AdultItalyPRA7C13-UBT/C13-UBT71.00% (29/41)74.00% (29/39)12Rescue13

Bock et al. [27], 2000AdultGermanyLRA7C13-UBT/C13-UBT72% (18/25)86% (18/21)04Rescue10

Zullo et al. [28], 2010AdultItalyORA10C13-UBT/C13-UBT76.40% (13/17)79.50% (13/16)103Third14

Van der Poorten and Katelaris [29], 2007AdultAustraliaPPI-RA10H, RUT, C13-UBT/C13-UBT72% (48/67)76% (48/63)74Rescue10

Perri et al. [30], 1998AdultItalyRAP7C13-UBT/C13-UBT79.00% (22/28)79.00% (22/28)10Rescue14

Gisbert et al. [31], 2014AdultSpainPPI-RA10—/C13-UBT52%53%5110FourthNA

Borody et al. [32], 2012AdultAustraliaORA14—/UBT92% (52/56)94% (52/55)4RescueNA

Moon et al. [33], 2012AdultKoreaLRA1292.2% (47/51)94% (47/50)1Third15

E: esomeprazole, O: omeprazole, PPI: proton pump inhibitor, P: pantoprazole, L: lansoprazole, A: amoxicillin, and R: rifabutin.
C: culture; UBT: urea breath test; H: histology; RUT: rapid urease test.
ФITT: intention to treat; PP: per protocol.
Rescue: rescue therapy, second: second-line therapy, third: three-line therapy, fourth: fourth-line therapy.
“—”: not reported; NA: not assessed.
Sign: 
Toracchio et al. (2005) [22]: patients in group 1 without previous exposure to triple therapy; patients in group 2 had already received one course of triple therapy.
Two abstracts, Gisbert et al. (2014) [31] and Borody et al. (2012) [32], quality cannot be assessed because we do not know the detailed method of studies.