Research Article
KRAS and BRAF Mutation Detection: Is Immunohistochemistry a Possible Alternative to Molecular Biology in Colorectal Cancer?
Table 1
KRAS, phenotype, and genotype.
| Case | Sex | Age (years) | KRAS staining | Molecular status (protein effect) |
| 1 | M | 75 | Positive | Mutated (G12D/G13D) | 2 | M | 68 | Positive | Mutated (G12A) | 3 | F | 65 | Positive | Mutated (G12C) | 4 | M | 53 | Negative | Mutated (G12D) | 5 | M | 72 | Negative | Mutated (G12V) | 6 | M | 61 | Negative | Mutated (G13D) | 7 | M | 72 | Negative | Mutated (G12S) | 8 | F | 59 | Negative | Mutated (G12R) | 9 | F | 61 | Negative | Mutated (G13D) | 10 | M | 41 | Negative | Mutated (G12A) | 11 | F | 66 | Negative | Mutated G12C) | 12 | M | 69 | Negative | Wild type | 13 | F | 52 | Negative | Wild type | 14 | M | 38 | Negative | Wild type | 15 | M | 69 | Negative | Wild type | 16 | M | 68 | Negative | Wild type | 17 | M | 68 | Negative | Wild type | 18 | M | 55 | Negative | Wild type | 19 | F | 72 | Negative | Wild type | 20 | M | 59 | Negative | Wild type | 21 | M | 67 | Negative | Wild type | 22 | M | 62 | Negative | Wild type | 23 | M | 57 | Negative | Wild type | 24 | M | 79 | Negative | Wild type | 25 | M | 75 | Negative | Wild type | 26 | M | 63 | Positive | Wild type | 27 | M | 72 | Positive | Wild type | 28 | F | 58 | Positive | Wild type | 29 | M | 53 | Positive | Wild type | 30 | F | 60 | Positive | Wild type | 31 | F | 42 | Positive | Wild type | 32 | M | 67 | Positive | Wild type | 33 | F | 70 | Positive | Wild type |
|
|
F: female; M: male; MSI: microsatellite-instable; MSS: microsatellite-stable.
|