Research Article

The Utility of Capsule Endoscopy in Patients under 50 Years of Age with Recurrent Iron Deficiency Anaemia: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

Table 1

Distribution of all the findings on capsule endoscopy in patients <50 and ≥50 years of age with recurrent iron deficiency anaemia.

All CE findingsGroup  1 () (%)Group  2 () (%) value (95% CI; odds ratio)

SB ulcers and erosions71 (26)174 (25)0.815 (0.8 to 1.4; 1.0)
SBAE27 (10)198 (28)<0.0001 (0.2 to 0.4; 0.3)
SB tumour7 (3)9 (1)0.177 (0.3 to 5.4; 2.0)
SB Crohn’s disease7 (3)10 (1)0.245 (0.7 to 4.7; 1.8)
Unspecified blood in the SB6 (2)37 (5)0.038 (0.2 to 1.0; 0.4)
SB strictures3 (1)8 (1)0.934 (0.3 to 3.6; 1.0)
SB varices2 (1)3 (0.4)0.568 (0.3 to 10.2; 1.7)
Others SB findings (polyps, diverticulum, dieulafoy, endometriosis, and celiac)6 (2)23 (3)0.353 (0.3 to 1.6; 0.7)
UGIT erosions and ulcers6 (2)46 (7)0.008 (0.1 to 0.7; 0.3)
Unspecified blood in the UGIT3 (1)23 (3)0.066 (0.1 to 1.1; 0.3)
GAVE2 (1)21 (3)0.051 (0.1 to 1.0; 0.2)
Other UGIT findings (portal hypertensive gastropathy, varices, AE, tumour, and UGIT polyps)8 (3)31 (5)0.273 (0.3 to 1.4; 0.6)
Colorectal lesions4 (2)16 (2)0.404 (0.2 to 1.9; 0.6)

CE: capsule endoscopy; IDA: iron deficiency anaemia; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; SB: small bowel; AE: angioectasia; UGIT: upper gastrointestinal tract; GAVE: gastric antral vascular ectasia.