Research Article
Comparison of BISAP, Ranson, MCTSI, and APACHE II in Predicting Severity and Prognoses of Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis in Chinese Patients
Table 1
Analysis of the four scoring systems in predicting severity of HLAP.
| Scoring system | MSAP and SAP | MAP | Total | OR | | |
| BISAP | | | | | | | ≥3 | 48 | 23 | 71 | 10.0 | 73.1 | 0.05 | <3 | 44 | 211 | 255 | | | | Ranson | | | | | | | ≥3 | 43 | 37 | 80 | 4.7 | 34.1 | 0.05 | <3 | 49 | 197 | 246 | | | | APACHE II | | | | | | | ≥8 | 52 | 26 | 78 | 10.4 | 74.8 | 0.05 | <8 | 40 | 208 | 248 | | | | MCTSI | | | | | | | ≥4 | 33 | 17 | 50 | 8.2 | 45.6 | 0.05 | <4 | 59 | 217 | 276 | | | |
| MAP = mild acute pancreatitis |
|
|