Research Article
Comparison of BISAP, Ranson, MCTSI, and APACHE II in Predicting Severity and Prognoses of Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis in Chinese Patients
Table 4
Comparison of 4 scoring systems in predicting severity, local complications, and mortality of HLAP.
| Scoring system | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV (%) | PLR | Youden index | AUC | 95% CI |
| MSAP and SAP | | | | | | | | BISAP | 54 | 86 | 68 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 0.795 | 0.660–0.929 | Ranson | 46 | 84 | 54 | 2.9 | 0.3 | 0.766 | 0.616–0.916 | APACHE II | 57 | 89 | 67 | 5.2 | 0.46 | 0.814 | 0.686–0.942 | MCTSI | 36 | 94 | 66 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.654 | 0.492–0.815 | Location complications | | | | | | | | BISAP | 54 | 81 | 21 | 2.8 | 0.35 | 0.731 | 0.581–0.881 | Ranson | 57 | 79 | 20 | 2.7 | 0.36 | 0.698 | 0.532–0.865 | APACHE II | 43 | 78 | 15 | 2.0 | 0.21 | 0.580 | 0.407–0.753 | MCTSI | 68 | 90 | 38 | 6.8 | 0.58 | 0.791 | 0.656–0.925 | Mortality | | | | | | | | BISAP | 89 | 80 | 15 | 4. 5 | 0.69 | 0.867 | 0.758–0.976 | Ranson | 78 | 77 | 9 | 3.4 | 0.55 | 0.842 | 0.722–0.962 | APACHE II | 89 | 78 | 10 | 4.0 | 0.67 | 0.854 | 0.724–0.984 | MCTSI | 78 | 86 | 14 | 5.6 | 0.64 | 0.839 | 0.721–0.957 |
|
|