Review Article

Clinical Significance of UCA1 to Predict Metastasis and Poor Prognosis of Digestive System Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Characteristics of included studies in this meta-analysis.

First author [ref.] YearCancerCountrySample sizeMethods for UCA1 detectingCut-off value for UCA1 UCA1 expressionStudy endpoints(HR, 95% CI) Data sourceFollow-up time (months)
High expressionHigh with LNMHigh with DMLow expressionLow with LNMLow with DM

Han [17]2014CRCChina80qRT-PCRMean value3717743187OSOS (U), 3.02 (1.19–7.68)CurveMean 42.6

Li [22] 2014ESCCChina90qRT-PCRMean value4122NA 4912NA.OSOS (U), 2.93 (1.72–6.21)DirectMedian 43
OS (M), 2.63 (1.42–5.87)Direct

Wang [13] 2015HCCChina98qRT-PCRMedian value49NA 3049NA 11OSOS (U), 2.69 (1.56–4.64)DirectUp to 60
OS (M), 1.86 (1.08–3.21)Direct

Zheng [15] 2015GCChina112qRT-PCRMedian value5635NA 5637NA OS, DFSOS (U), 2.35 (1.40–4.51)DirectUp to 60
OS (M), 2.35 (1.22–4.52)Direct
DFS (U), 2.90 (1.51–5.80)Direct
DFS (M), 2.55 (1.33–4.97)Direct

Yang [14] 2015HCCKorea240Illumina expression beadchipMedian value120NA NA 120NA NA OS, DFSOS (U), 1.99 (0.84–4.69)DirectUp to 120
DFS (U), 2.35 (1.07–5.17)Direct
DFS (M), 2.40 (1.09–5.27)Direct

Ni [18] 2015CRCChina54qRT-PCRMedian value271262751OSOS (U), 5.07 (1.25–20.54)Available dataUp to 50
OS (M), 3.14 (1.17–8.41)Available data

Chen [21]2015PDACUSA63Affymetrix 2.0 microarrayNANANANANANANAOSOS (U), 2.76 (1.15–6.61)Available dataMedian 21
Tao [19] 2015CRCChina80qRT-PCRFourth quartile2013NA 6021NA OSOS (U), 2.46 (1.26–4.78)DirectUp to 72
OS (M), 2.00 (1.01–2.98)Direct

Bian [20]2016CRCChina90qRT-PCRMedian value4530845234OSOS (U), 3.27 (1.44–7.41)DirectUp to 80
OS (M), 2.40 (1.04–5.50)Direct
105NANANANANANAOSOS (U), 1.71 (1.21–2.40)CurveUp to 120

Shang [16]2016GCChina77qRT-PCRNANANANANANANADFSDFS (M), 2.54 (1,09–5.92)DirectUp to 72

NA, not available; qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; LNM, lymph node metastasis; DM, distant metastasis; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; U, univariate analysis; M, multivariate analysis; Curve, Kaplan–Meier curve; this study included two cohorts of CRC patients; we named them Bian et al. and Bian et al., respectively, in the following analysis.