Review Article
Clinical Significance of UCA1 to Predict Metastasis and Poor Prognosis of Digestive System Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis
Table 2
Newcastle-Ottawa quality for included studies in this meta-analysis.
| First author and year [ref.] | Selection (score) | Comparability (score) | Outcome (score) | Total score | Representativeness of exposed | Selection of nonexposed | Ascertainment of exposure | No interest before study | Study design (cohort study) | Control for other confounding factors | Assessment of outcome | Follow-up time long enough (>5 years ) | Adequacy number of follow-ups (>80% ) |
| Han 2014 [17] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | Li 2014 [22] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | Wang 2015 [13] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | Zheng 2015 [15] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | Yang 2015 [14] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | Ni 2015 [18] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | Chen 2015 [21] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | Tao 2015 [19] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | Bian 2016 [20] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | Shang 2016 [16] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
|
|