Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2016, Article ID 6587825, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6587825
Research Article

Snapshot on a Pilot Metagenomic Study for the Appraisal of Gut Microbial Diversity in Mice, Cat, and Man

1Université Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR 8204, Centre d’Infection et d’Immunité de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
2Genoscreen, Service of Research, Development and Innovation in Health and Environment, 1 rue du Pr Calmette, BP 245, 59019 Lille, France

Received 25 January 2016; Revised 8 March 2016; Accepted 31 March 2016

Academic Editor: Helieh Oz

Copyright © 2016 Coline Plé et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 379–423, 1948. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. J. G. Caporaso, J. Kuczynski, J. I. Stombaugh et al., “QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data,” Nature Methods, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 335–336, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. A. Lozupone, J. I. Stombaugh, J. I. Gordon, J. K. Jansson, and R. Knight, “Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota,” Nature, vol. 489, no. 7415, pp. 220–230, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. K. Benson, S. A. Kelly, R. Legge et al., “Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 44, pp. 18933–18938, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Walker, B. Pfitzner, S. Neschen et al., “Distinct signatures of host-microbial meta-metabolome and gut microbiome in two C57BL/6 strains under high-fat diet,” ISME Journal, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2380–2396, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. D. Patterson and P. J. Turnbaugh, “Microbial determinants of biochemical individuality and their impact on toxicology and pharmacology,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 761–768, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. H. Campbell, C. M. Foster, T. Vishnivetskaya et al., “Host genetic and environmental effects on mouse intestinal microbiota,” The ISME Journal, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 2033–2044, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. K. Friswell, H. Gika, I. J. Stratford et al., “Site and strain-specific variation in gut microbiota profiles and metabolism in experimental mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e8584, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Walker, B. Pfitzner, S. Neschen et al., “Distinct signatures of host-microbial meta-metabolome and gut microbiome in two C57BL/6 strains under high-fat diet,” The ISME Journal, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2380–2396, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Richmond, “The 3Rs—past, present and future,” Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 84–92, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. P. Hanage, “Microbiology: microbiome science needs a healthy dose of scepticism,” Nature, vol. 512, no. 7514, pp. 247–248, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus