Capsule Endoscopy for Crohn’s Disease: Current Status of Diagnosis and Management
Table 1
Comparison of video capsule endoscopy with small bowel barium radiography: diagnostic yield or performance for suspected or established Crohn’s disease.
Grade 0: normal Grade 1: erythema, isolated villi loss Grade 2: erosion, no ulcer Grade 3: ulcers, spontaneous bleeding, and/or stricture
70%
NA
SBFT
Grade 0: normal Grade 1: minimal nodularity, ulcerations, normal luminal diameter, and <5 cm involvement Grade 2: more extensive ulcers, minimal luminal narrowing, and 5–10 cm involvement Grade 3: fistula, skip areas, extensive ulcerations, and >10 cm involvement
Diffuse small bowel lesions, multiple (>3) erosions, or ulcers that were serpiginous, deep fissuring, coalescing, linear, or nodular
71% (22/31)
NA
EC ()
Fold thickening, aphthous ulceration, granular appearances of the villi, nodular pattern, the presence of ulcerations on the mesenteric border, cobblestone appearance, fixed stenosis and/or strictures, and fistulae
Aphthous mucosal lesions, irregularly shaped or fissural ulcers (occasionally associated with bleeding), cobblestone appearance, luminal narrowing due to oedema and/or fibrous scarring, and granularity with attenuated or lost vascular pattern
VCE, video capsule endoscopy; NA, not available; SBFT, small bowel follow-through; EC, enteroclysis; CD, Crohn’s disease. (1)No specific criteria for positive findings of CD were provided in the text. Diagnosis was made by a consensus panel of the coinvestigators in this study.