Different Types of Periampullary Duodenal Diverticula Are Associated with Occurrence and Recurrence of Bile Duct Stones: A Case-Control Study from a Chinese Center
Table 1
Comparison of cholangiopancreatic disorders and technical success of ERCP according to the presence of PAD.
PAD ()
Control ()
Odds ratio [95% CI]
Median age (yr) (range)
62 (23–90)
61 (26–87)
0.542
Gender: (%)
Male
83 (51.6)
249 (51.6)
1.000
Female
78 (48.4)
234 (48.4)
Biliary disorders: (%)
CBD and gall stones
10 (6.2)
55 (11.4)
0.068
CBD stones only
96 (59.6)
169 (35.0)
<0.001
0.008
2.09 [1.213–3.602]
Gall stones only
12 (7.5)
46 (9.5)
0.428
Benign bile duct strictures
13 (8.1)
71 (14.7)
0.031
0.154
0.61 [0.311–1.203]
Periampullary carcinoma
11 (6.8)
104 (21.5)
<0.001
0.004
0.35 [0.174–0.710]
Previous cholecystectomy
63 (39.1)
116 (24.0)
<0.001
0.712
1.10 [0.653–1.867]
Pancreatic disorders: (%)
Acute pancreatitis
51 (31.7)
125 (25.9)
0.153
Chronic pancreatitis
5 (3.1)
9 (1.9)
0.349
Successful cannulation: (%)
153 (95.0)
444 (91.9)
0.190
Complications: (%)
Post-ERCP pancreatitis
26 (16.1)
61 (12.6)
0.258
Perforation
2 (1.2)
12 (2.5)
0.533
Student’s -test for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables. The multivariate logistic regression model included variables which are confirmed to be statistically significant by univariate analysis as independent variables and PAD as dependent variable. CBD: common bile duct; ERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
