Clinical Study

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Locally Advanced Rectal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Table 2

Surgical and pathological outcomes between nCRT and surgery-alone groups.

CharacteristicsnCRT ()Surgery alone ()P value

Operative time (min)0.765
Estimated blood loss (mL)0.631
Conversion rate3 (6.2)1 (2.1)0.617
Surgical approach0.837
 Laparoscopy22 (45.8)21 (43.8)
 Open26 (54.2)27 (56.2)
Surgical procedure0.009
 LAR38 (79.2)29 (60.4)
 APR6 (12.5)18 (37.5)
 Hartmann’s procedure4 (8.3)1 (2.1)
Sphincter preservation38 (79.2)29 (60.4)0.045
Temporary diverting ileostomy25 (52.1)11 (22.9)0.003
Length of resection margin (cm)
 Proximal0.461
 Distal0.612
Number of lymph nodes retrieved0.001
Number of positive lymph nodes0.046
Resection margin involvement
 Distal01 (2.1)NA
 CRM (≤1.0 mm)1 (2.1)5 (10.4)0.204
Neural or lymphovascular invasion4 (8.3)6 (12.5)0.740
pTNM stage< 0.001
 02 (4.2)0
 I7 (14.6)0
 II15 (31.2)3 (6.2)
 III24 (50.0)45 (93.8)
Rectal cancer regression grade
 115 (31.3)NANA
 220 (41.6)NANA
 313 (27.1)NANA
Tumor downstaging21 (43.8)NANA
Nodal downstaging24 (50.0)NANA
Pathological complete response2 (4.1)NANA

Fisher’s exact test.
Data are expressed as (%) or as median ± standard deviation, where appropriate. Row percents are presented. Significant differences are in bold.
nCRT: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; LAR: low anterior resection; APR: abdominoperineal resection; NA: not applicable; CRM: circumferential resection margin.