Clinical Study

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Locally Advanced Rectal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Table 5

Previously reported outcomes between mucinous and nonmucinous rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

YearAuthorPatientsResponse to chemoradiotherapyP value Long-term survival
5-year OS (%) value5-year DFS (%) value

2006 Sengul et al. [8] Mucinous, 16
TRG1, 1 (6%); TRG2, 2 (12.5%); TRG3, 3 (19%);
TRG4, 6 (37.5%); TRG5, 4 (25%)
0.002 (TRG)NA NANA NA
ā€‰T downstaging, 0; N downstaging, 18%0.009 (T downstaging) NA NA
Nonmucinous, 46TRG1, 6 (13%); TRG2, 23 (50%); TRG3, 6 (13%);
TRG4, 11 (24%); TRG5, 0
T downstaging 25%, N downstaging 76%0.006 (N downstaging)

2007Grillo-Ruggieri et al. [9]Mucinous, 25T downstaging 52%, N downstaging 64% <0.0589 NS87.3 NS
Nonmucinous, 111T downstaging 74.4%, N downstaging 85.5%83.967.6

2011 Shin et al. [10]Mucinous, 23T downstaging 54.9%, N downstaging 52.2%0.03 (T downstaging)64.8 0.04958.7 0.045
Nonmucinous, 345T downstaging 30.4%, N downstaging 53.3%NS (N downstaging)79.869.2

2012Oberholzer et al. [11]Mucinous, 21T downstaging 18.8%, N downstaging 27.2%0.012 (T downstaging)NA NANA NA
Nonmucinous, 67T downstaging 55.2%, N downstaging 80.7%0.007 (N downstaging)NANA

2014 Yu et al. [12]Mucinous, 60T downstaging 23% 0.0169 0.0448 0.006
Nonmucinous, 270T downstaging 40%7971

2015 Hugen et al. [13]Mucinous, 58T downstaging 55.2% 0.03964.3 0.459NA NA
Nonmucinous, 482T downstaging 68.7%70.6NA

TRG: tumor regression grade; T: depth of tumor invasion; N: lymph node status; NA: not available; NS: not significant.