Research Article

Prognostic Value of Metastatic Tumoral Caveolin-1 Expression in Patients with Resected Gastric Cancer

Table 2

Correlations between clinicopathologic findings and caveolin-1 expression.

Primary tumoral Cav-1 expressionStromal Cav-1 expressionMetastatic tumoral Cav-1 expression
Low, n (%)High, n (%)Low, n (%)High, n (%)Low, n (%)High, n (%)

No. of patients127 (87.6)18 (12.4)109 (77.3)32 (22.7)76 (83.5)15 (16.5)
TNM stage
 I16 (12.6)4 (22.2)16 (14.7)4 (12.5)1 (1.3)0 (0)
 II38 (29.9)6 (33.3)33 (30.3)9 (28.1)10 (13.2)3 (20.0)
 III73 (57.5)8 (44.5)60 (55.0)19 (59.4)65 (85.5)12 (80.0)
value0.4310.9600.540
Tumor grade
 Well15 (11.8)1 (5.6)9 (8.3)6 (18.8)3 (3.9)1 (6.7)
 Moderately–poorly112 (88.2)17 (94.4)100 (91.7)26 (81.2)73 (96.1)14 (93.3)
value0.6940.1060.520
Lymphatic invasion
 No22 (17.5)5 (27.8)21 (19.4)6 (18.8)4 (5.3)0 (0)
 Yes104 (82.5)13 (72.2)87 (80.6)26 (81.2)72 (94.7)15 (100)
value0.33311
Vascular invasion
 No110 (90.9)17 (94.4)95 (92.2)28 (87.5)67 (90.3)10 (71.4)
 Yes11 (9.1)1 (5.6)8 (7.8)4 (12.5)7 (9.70)4 (28.6)
value10.4780.069
Lauren classification
 Nondiffuse type60 (47.2)8 (44.4)46 (41.8)20 (62.5)29 (37.8)9 (60.0)
 Diffuse type67 (52.8)10 (55.6)63 (58.2)12 (37.5)47 (62.2)6 (40.0)
value10.0450.154

Statistically significant ().