Review Article

Routine Drainage of Colorectal Anastomoses: An Evidence-Based Review of the Current Literature

Table 3

Rates of AL in drained and nondrained patients in the studies included.

StudyNumberAL in drained group (%)AL in nondrained group (%)Use of protective stoma (%)

Peeters et al. [5]9249.623.556.6
Qu et al. [6]45805.39.222.5
Kawada et al. [7]15410.820.80
Akiyoshi et al. [8]3362.66.318.5
Rondelli et al. [9]22777.27.443.5
Tsujinaka et al. [11]19610.7NA23.5
Urbach et al. [14]4148.96.4NA
Petrowsky et al. [15]13904.22.4NA
Karliczek et al. [16]114021NA
Zhang et al. [17]18037.15.7NA
Menahem et al. [18]66014.816.7NA
Rolph et al. [19]9081.71.2NA
Yeh et al. [20]9782.810
Denost et al. [21]4699.38.675
Boccola et al. [23]15768.55.16
Median7.2 (1.7–14.8)6.4 (1–23.5)22.5 (0–75)

AL: anastomotic leakage. NA: not available.