Review Article

Association between HLA-DQ Gene Polymorphisms and HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Table 2

Main results of the meta-analysis of the association between HLA-DQ (rs2856718) polymorphisms and the risk of HBV-related HCC.

ComparisonSubgroupOR (95% CI)ModelHeterogeneity testPZPE
I2 (%)PH

HCC versus control
Dominant model (AG + GG versus AA)Overall0.54 (0.47–0.62)F00.688<0.0010.41
Chinese0.53 (0.46–0.61)F00.990<0.0010.06
Saudi Arabian0.74 (0.44–1.29)0.294
Recessive model (GG versus AG + AA)Overall0.60 (0.51–0.70)F42.70.155<0.0010.51
Chinese0.59 (0.50–0.69)R55.60.105<0.0010.22
Saudi Arabian0.77 (0.43–1.35)0.36
Homozygous model (GG versus AA)Overall0.44 (0.37–0.53)F23.20.271<0.0010.82
Chinese0.43 (0.36–0.51)F13.70.314<0.0010.24
Saudi Arabian0.67 (0.34–1.30)0.24
Heterozygous model (AG versus AA)Overall0.59 (0.52–0.68)F00.704<0.0010.09
Chinese0.58 (0.50–0.68)F00.841<0.0010.32
Saudi Arabian0.80 (0.45–1.45)0.46
Allele model (G versus A)Overall0.64 (0.58–0.70)F23.00.273<0.0010.88
Chinese0.63 (0.57–0.69)F9.80.330<0.0010.22
Saudi Arabian0.80 (0.50–1.14)0.21
HCC versus CHB
Dominant model (AG + GG versus AA)Overall0.83 (0.63–1.10)R60.4%0.0560.1940.308
Chinese0.72 (0.62–0.83)F00.093<0.0010.283
Saudi Arabian1. 53 (0.90–2.60)0.112
Recessive model (GG versus AG + AA)Overall0.92 (0.78–1.09)F00.6260.3420.058
Chinese0.94 (0.78–1.12)F00.5110.4850.251
Saudi Arabian0.77 (0.44–1.36)F00.370
Homozygous model (GG versus AA)Overall0.79 (0.69–0.95)F00.6760.0140.982
Chinese0.78 (0.63–0.93)F00.7960.0080.271
Saudi Arabian1.09 (0.57–2.10)F00.787
Heterozygous model (AG versus AA)Overall0.90 (0.61–1.32)R75.90.0060.5790.245
Chinese0.70 (0.60–0.81)F00.719<0.0010.281
Saudi Arabian2.00 (1.12–3.58)F00.019
Allele model (G versus A)Overall0.85 (0.78–0.94)F00.4860.0010.707
Chinese0.84 (0.76–0.92)F00.887<0.0010.229
Saudi Arabian1.10 (0.77–1.56)F00.599

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; PH: value of heterogeneity test; PZ: value of Z test; PE: value of Egger’s test; R: random effect model; F: fixed effect model. Because there was only one study with this genotype of rs2856718, the value could not be calculated.