Research Article

Clinical Factors of Delayed Perforation after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms

Table 3

Clinical factors related to delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (%).

Clinicopathological findingUnivariate analysis
Cases without delayed perforation (99.58)Cases with delayed perforation (0.42) value

Sex0.32
 Male934 (99.7)3 (0.3)
 Female260 (99.2)2 (0.8)
Age (yr)0.28
 <70523 (99.8)1 (0.2)
 ≥70671 (99.4)4 (0.6)
Stomach status0.8
 Normal/remnant stomach1179 (99.6)5 (0.4)
 Gastric tube15 (100)0 (0.0)
Location0.0004
 Upper218 (98.2)4 (1.8)
 Middle/lower976 (99.9)1 (0.1)
Size (mm)0.076
 ≤20891 (99.8)2 (0.2)
 >20303 (99.0)3 (1.0)
Depth of invasion0.097
 M1026 (99.7)3 (0.3)
 SM168 (98.8)2 (1.2)
Ulceration0.4
 Absent1046 (99.5)5 (0.5)
 Present148 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Procedure time (hours)0.55
 <2863 (99.7)3 (0.3)
 ≥2334 (99.4)2 (0.6)