|
Author | Country | Subjects | Patients (n) T/C | Age (yr) T/C | M/F | Intervention groups T/C | Method for judging feeding tube | Outcomes |
|
Griffith 2003 | USA | Surgical critically ill patients requiring enteral nutrition Age: ≥18 years | 14/22 | 54.6/59.7 | 25/11 | Erythromycin 500 mg IV single dose versus saline placebo | An abdominal X-ray was obtained within 1 hr of the procedure | Successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion |
Kalliafas 1996 | USA | Surgical critically ill patients requiring enteral nutrition Age: ≥18 years | 31/26 | 54.7/57.3 | 30/27 | Erythromycin 200 mg IV single dose versus saline placebo | An abdominal X-ray was obtained within 30 min of the procedure | Successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion |
Paz 1996 | USA | Critically ill patients requiring enteral nutrition Age: 22–85 years | 21/16 | 58.9/68.4 | 36/27 | Erythromycin 200 mg IV single dose versus saline placebo | A chest radiograph was obtained 30 min after tube placement | (1) Successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion (2) Number of attempts prior to successful tube placement |
Van den 2011 | Netherlands | Acute pancreatitis patients requiring jejunal enteral nutrition (exclude ICU) Age: 18–80 years | 22/18 | 49.0/52.0 | 17/23 | Erythromycin 250 mg IV four dose versus saline placebo | An abdominal X-ray was obtained at 24/48 hr of the procedure | Successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion |
Zhao 2002 | China | Critically ill patients requiring enteral nutrition Age: 26–85 years | 19/18 | 58.0/60.0 | 25/12 | Erythromycin 250 mg IV single dose versus saline placebo | An abdominal X-ray was obtained within 3 hr of the procedure | Successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion |
Chen 2009 | China | Critically ill patients requiring enteral nutrition Age: ≥18 years | 39/42 | 72.1/65.9 | 50/31 | Erythromycin 250 mg IV two dose versus saline placebo | An abdominal X-ray was obtained after 24 hr of the procedure | Successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion |
|