Research Article

Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Alone versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Bile Duct Stones

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study patients who underwent EPLBD and EST.

ESTEPLBD value
()()

Age, mean(SD), years67.0 (14.6)70.1 (14.6)0.17
Sex, male/female32/2876/850.45
Diameter of CBD (mm), mean (SD)14.9 (3.3)14.9 (2.8)0.85
Number of CBDS, mean (SD)1.2 (0.6)1.3 (1.2)0.58
Maximum stone size (mm), mean (SD)12.1 (2.8)12.7 (3.6)0.2
Periampullary diverticulum, (%)14 (23.3%)85 (52.8%)0.01
Status of gallbladder
 Previous cholecystectomy, (%)29 (48.3%)67 (41.6%)0.45
 Cholecystectomy after ERCP, (%)7 (11.7%)14 (8.7%)0.61
 Gallbladder with stones in situ, (%)7 (11.7%)35 (21.7%)0.12
 Gallbladder without stones in situ, (%)17 (28.3%)45 (28.1%)>0.99

The values are shown in mean ± standard deviation (SD). EPLBD: endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; EST: endoscopic sphincterotomy; CBD: common bile duct; ERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; CBDS: common bile duct stone.