Review Article
A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Prokinetic Agents against Glycemic Control
Table 5
The results of meta-analysis for insulin.
| Studies | Treatment | Control | Standardized mean diff. | 95% lower CI | 95% upper CI | Weights | value | | Mean | SD | | Mean | SD |
| Nam, J. S. et al., 2010 | 20 | 34.51 | 20.09 | 10 | 38.03 | 25.11 | -0.157 | -0.917 | 0.603 | 33.0% | | Ueno, N. et al., 2001 | 30 | 42 | 5.8 | 22 | 31.9 | 4.6 | 1.867 | 1.202 | 2.532 | 33.6% | | Ueno, N. et al., 2002 | 17 | 40.8 | 22.68 | 17 | 54.7 | 19.05 | -0.648 | -1.340 | 0.044 | 33.4% | | Total (random effect model) | | | | | | | 0.359 | -1.205 | 1.923 | | 0.65 | Subgroup 1 (Nam, J. S. et al., 2010; Ueno, N. et al., 2002) (random effect model) | | | | | | | -0.426 | -0.937 | 0.086 | | 0.10 |
|
|
value of the test of heterogeneity among ; Higgins’ (83.6%, 97.2%). |