Etiologies of Long-Term Postcholecystectomy Symptoms: A Systematic Review

Latenstein, Carmen S. S.; Wennmacker, Sarah Z.; de Jong, Judith J.; van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M.; Drenth, Joost P. H.; de Reuver, Philip R.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4278373

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 4278373 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4278373

Etiologies of Long-Term Postcholecystectomy Symptoms: A Systematic Review

Carmen S. S. Latenstein,¹Sarah Z. Wennmacker,¹Judith J. de Jong,²Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven,¹Joost P. H. Drenth,²and Philip R. de Reuver¹

Academic Editor: Konstantinos Triantafyllou

Received09 Nov 2018

Revised28 Jan 2019

Accepted10 Feb 2019

Published14 Apr 2019

Abstract

Background. Cholecystectomy does not relieve abdominal symptoms in up to 40% of patients. With 700,000 cholecystectomies performed in the US, annually, about 280,000 patients are left with symptoms, making this a serious problem. We performed a systematic review to determine the different etiologies of long-term postcholecystectomy symptoms with the aim to provide guidance for clinicians treating these patients. Methods. A systematic search of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Articles describing at least one possible etiology of long-term symptoms after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this review. Long-term symptoms were defined as abdominal symptoms that were present at least four weeks after cholecystectomy, either persistent or incident. The etiologies of persistent and incident symptoms after LC and the mechanism or hypothesis behind the etiologies are provided. If available, the prevalence of the discussed etiology is provided. Results. The search strategy identified 3320 articles of which 130 articles were included. Etiologies for persistent symptoms were residual and newly formed gallstones (41 studies, prevalence ranged from 0.2 to 23%), coexistent diseases (64 studies, prevalence 1-65%), and psychological distress (13 studies, no prevalence provided). Etiologies for incident symptoms were surgical complications (21 studies, prevalence 1-3%) and physiological changes (39 studies, prevalence 16-58%). Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) was reported as an etiology for both persistent and incident symptoms (21 studies, prevalence 3-40%). Conclusion. Long-term postcholecystectomy symptoms vary amongst patients, arise from different etiologies, and require specific diagnostic and treatment strategies. Most symptoms after cholecystectomy seem to be caused by coexistent diseases and physiological changes due to cholecystectomy. The outcome of this research is summarized in a decision tree to give clinical guidance on the treatment of patients with symptoms after cholecystectomy.

1. Introduction

In the United States (US), approximately 1.8 million patients are diagnosed with gallstones every year [1]. In the majority of patients, gallstones will stay asymptomatic. Approximately 20% of patients will experience symptoms, like a biliary colic, for which laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred treatment [2–4]. As a consequence, LC is one of the most performed elective abdominal surgeries worldwide, with approximately 700,000 LCs in the US [5].

Although LC is the preferred treatment to relieve symptoms, previous studies show that long-term abdominal symptoms are present in up to 40% of patients after LC [6–9]. This equals a yearly growth of 280,000 cases with abdominal symptoms after LC in the US. Patients suffer from symptoms like diarrhea, gas bloating, nausea, vomiting, jaundice, or abdominal pain. These symptoms after LC are a significant burden to health care systems, as 56% of patients need additional health care for diagnosis and treatment, against direct median hospital costs of $555 per year per patient. Moreover, sick leave and production loss of employed patients add an additional $361 per year per patient for work-related costs [10].

Abdominal symptoms after LC are often summarized as “postcholecystectomy syndrome.” However, postcholecystectomy syndrome is an arbitrary term that loosely describes the presence of symptoms after LC and consists of many persistent and incident symptoms [11–15]. In order to help patients with abdominal symptoms after LC, a specific diagnosis or etiology of the complaints is needed to provide targeted treatment. Therefore, this systematic review is aimed at providing an overview of the literature on etiologies of abdominal symptoms after LC and ultimately to assist clinicians in identifying the cause of patients’ symptoms after LC and optimize treatment.

2. Methods

The PRISMA guideline (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) was used to perform this systematic review [16].

2.1. Search Strategy

A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of MEDLINE (1946–June 2018), Web of Science (1945–June 2018), and EMBASE (1980–June 2018). The search was performed using a search strategy that included terms for “(postcholecystectomy) abdominal symptoms,” “cholecystectomy,” and “cholecystolithiasis” (the full search strategy is shown in Supplementary Table 1).

2.2. Study Selection

Two reviewers (C.L. and S.W.) independently screened the titles and abstracts of the identified articles to select potentially relevant studies. Studies on abdominal symptoms after LC in uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis years, reporting at least one potential etiology for long-term symptoms, were eligible for inclusion. Long-term symptoms after LC were defined as any type of abdominal symptoms that were present at least four weeks after LC. Case reports, case series, editorials, and studies in a language other than English, Dutch, or German were excluded. Studies including patients after open cholecystectomy were excluded, as this does not reflect current surgical practice [17]. Discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved by discussion and consensus. In case of overlapping data, the most recent study with the largest cohort was included.

2.3. Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were independently extracted by the two reviewers (C.L. and S.W.), using a predefined data extraction form. All described etiologies for long-term postcholecystectomy symptoms and the prevalence of these etiologies (if provided in the study) were extracted. Further extracted data included the following study characteristics: author, year of publication, country, study design, sample size, and follow-up period, and additional data on patients’ age and gender, and long-term postcholecystectomy symptoms. Again, discrepancies between reviewers were resolved by discussion and consensus.

Subsequently, all etiologies were categorized as etiology for “persistent symptoms” or “incident symptoms” after LC and reported in subgroups per category. Persistent symptoms were defined as symptoms that are similar to patients’ preoperative symptoms. Incident symptoms were defined as symptoms that were not present before LC. Primary outcomes of this review were the etiologies of persistent and incident symptoms after LC; the range in prevalence of each etiology in the included studies was reported.

3. Results

3.1. Selected Studies

The search strategy identified 3320 articles. After removal of duplicates, titles and abstracts of 2226 articles were screened and 269 articles were selected for full-text evaluation. Finally, 130 articles were included in this review, as shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Study Characteristics

The included studies composed of 77 prospective cohort studies, 24 retrospective cohort studies, 20 reviews, five randomized controlled trials, and four systematic reviews. Most studies were performed in Europe and North America. The postoperative follow-up period in the included studies varied from four weeks to 18 years after LC. Full study characteristics are summarized in Table S2 in the supplementary files.

3.3. Reported Etiologies of Long-Term Symptoms after LC

The reviewed literature reported the following symptoms: biliary pain, pain attacks, continuous pain, pain related to food, functional dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal bloating, reflux, diarrhea, constipation, functional bowel problems, fever, and jaundice.

Persistent symptoms after LC were summarized into four subgroups: “residual and newly formed gallstones,” “coexistent diseases,” “psychological distress,” and “sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.” Three subgroups for etiologies of incident symptoms after LC were established: “sphincter of Oddi dysfunction,” “surgical complications,” and “physiological changes” (Figure 2). Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) can cause persistent symptoms; however, most often it arises after LC. The etiologies reported per included study and if provided the percentage of patients with a certain etiology as cause for symptoms after LC are summarized in Table S2.

4. Persistent Symptoms

4.1. Residual and Newly Formed Gallstones

Forty-one studies reported residual or newly formed gallstones as the etiology for long-term persistent abdominal symptoms after LC. A total of 23 studies provided the prevalence of residual and newly formed gallstones as the cause for symptoms, ranging from 0.2% to 23%. Residual stones are most commonly diagnosed as retained common bile duct stones (choledocholithiasis), stones, or sludge in a cystic duct remnant or stones within the remnant gallbladder due to a subtotal cholecystectomy in difficult surgical cases. Residual stones in the cystic duct or gallbladder remnant can result in recurrent biliary colics [18–22]. Usually, these symptoms are self-limiting. Choledocholithiasis after LC is associated with epigastric pain, elevated ALT and AST levels, and sometimes jaundice [22–24]. Additional abdominal ultrasound might show a dilated common bile duct [19]. Moreover, new gallstones can be formed within the bile ducts or gallbladder remnants, after LC. Depending on the location in the biliary tract, symptoms will be similar to cystic duct or gallbladder remnant stones, or choledocholithiasis [25, 26].

4.2. Coexistent Diseases

Sixty-four studies reported coexistent diseases as the etiology for long-term persistent abdominal symptoms after LC. Eighteen studies provided the prevalence of coexistent diseases after LC ranging from 1% to 65%. Coexistent diseases in patients with gallstones are common and mainly nonbiliary: gastroesophageal reflux, peptic ulcer, hiatus hernia, gastritis, constipation, IBS, Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome (ACNES), fatty liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or coronary artery disease [27, 28]. Preoperative distinction between symptoms caused by coexistent diseases and gallstones is challenging [29–32]. Misinterpretation of symptoms and suboptimal indication for LC will result in persistent symptoms after surgery [8, 9, 27, 30–36]. Even if the indication for LC was made correctly and the biliary symptoms are resolved, symptoms of a coexistent disease can become more prominent and considered as persistent symptoms after LC [29, 37].

4.3. Psychological Distress

Thirteen studies reported psychological distress as the etiology for long-term persistent abdominal symptoms after LC. None of these studies provided prevalence for psychological distress as cause for symptoms after LC. Several hypotheses exist on why psychologically distressed patients are more likely to experience persistent symptoms after LC. First, psychologically distressed patients tend to experience more functional gastrointestinal symptoms, which are not relieved by LC [38–40]. Secondly, psychological distress may induce visceral hyperalgesia that exacerbates subjective perception of pain both preoperatively and postoperatively [41]. Third, these patients are prone to experience somatization symptoms which may cause overreporting of symptoms [42]. Somatization symptoms are also less likely to be alleviated by surgery [39, 43]. Considering the different perceptions and interpretations, patients with psychological distress are more at risk for poor decision-making [38–40].

4.4. Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction

Seventeen studies reported sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) as the etiology for long-term abdominal symptoms after LC. Prevalence of SOD after LC was reported in four studies and ranged from 3% to 40%. SOD mainly presents as right upper quadrant (biliary) pain and is not easily distinguished from symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, irritable bowel syndrome, or functional dyspepsia [44]. If SOD symptoms have been incorrectly attributed to gallstones, symptoms will persist after LC [15, 45, 46]. However, SOD most often commences after LC as incident symptoms, in which case interrupted neural pathways between the duodenum, gallbladder, and sphincter of Oddi after surgery lead to sphincter of Oddi spasms or SOD [47–50]. SOD can be divided in three types: type I (biliary pain, abnormal liver tests, and dilated bile duct), type II (biliary pain and abnormal liver tests or dilated bile duct), and type III (only biliary pain) [51, 52].

5. Incident Symptoms

5.1. Surgical Complications

Twenty-one studies reported surgical complications as the etiology for long-term symptoms after LC. Prevalence of long-term symptoms after LC caused by surgical complications was reported in eight studies, ranging from 1% to 3%. Bile duct injury is the most feared surgical complication [53, 54]. Patients can develop upper abdominal pain with jaundice, fever, and possibly sepsis [48]. Even if the bile duct injury is treated with surgical or endoscopic intervention, strictures or leakages can result in long-term symptoms of pain and biliary obstruction [15, 53, 55].

Spillage of gallstones into the peritoneal cavity is another complication associated with long-term postoperative pain, which can lead to abscesses, general peritonitis, adhesions, and fistulae, even several years after surgery [56–59]. However, the majority of dropped gallstones remain clinically silent [58].

Pain or discomfort due to late postoperative complications can arise from infections, wound healing problems, or a trocar site hernia [40, 60–67].

5.2. Physiological Changes

Thirty-nine studies reported physiological changes after surgery as the etiology for incident abdominal symptoms after LC. The prevalence of physiological changes after LC was described in 17 studies, ranging from 16% to 58%. Long-term effects of LC on bile acid metabolism were reported in several studies [61, 68–70]. Prior to LC, bile acids are stored in the gallbladder and bile acids are released in the duodenum by meal-induced intermittent contractions. LC results in the loss of reservoir function of the gallbladder and an altered bile metabolism. The pathophysiology of increased bile flow has not been completely clarified. However, the continuous flow of bile acids into the duodenum attributes to increased duodenal-gastric reflux and can cause symptoms of dyspepsia and an elevated risk of gastritis [49, 71–73]. Decreased esophageal sphincter pressure after LC may further attribute to dyspepsia and gastritis symptoms [61, 66, 74].

The reduced bile salt pool after LC could also induce subclinical fat malabsorption and result in diarrhea. The constant presence of bile acids in the gut, which promotes secretion and motility, could additionally result in a shortened whole gut transit time, contributing to postoperative diarrhea and flatulence [49, 68, 69].

5.3. Others

Fifteen studies reported various other etiologies for incident long-term abdominal symptoms after LC. Changed dietary intake, mainly waiving preoperative dietary restrictions, or physical inactivity may attribute to symptoms after LC [61, 75].

6. Discussion

This systematic review provides a qualitative overview of etiologies of long-term abdominal symptoms after LC. Most symptoms after LC seem to be caused by coexistent diseases and physiological changes due to LC. Based on the etiologies of persistent and incident symptoms after LC provided in this review, we constructed a decision tree to help clinicians identify the cause of long-term symptoms after LC and optimize treatment for these patients (Figure 3).

“Postcholecystectomy syndrome” is a collective term for all symptoms after LC. This general term is not an adequate diagnosis [76–78], as multiple etiologies requiring distinct treatments may cause “postcholecystectomy syndrome.” Moreover, some symptoms are not even related to LC itself. To establish the cause of long-term symptoms after LC and decide on the proper treatment to alleviate symptoms, the underlying etiology of symptoms should be pursued.

Previous reviews divided all causes for symptoms after LC into organ systems [13] (e.g., biliary causes, pancreatic causes, other gastrointestinal disorders, or extraintestinal disorders) or listed all diagnoses individually (e.g., peptic ulcer disease, hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflux, residual stones, strictures, and SOD) [76]. The latter is a review with a limited search reach and only 21 included articles [76]. In this review, we categorized long-term postoperative symptoms as persistent or incident symptoms after LC, thereby providing a first step in deducting the causes for long-term symptoms. If the persistent or incident nature of the symptoms is established, the categories and subgroups presented in this review are a tool for clinicians in the assessment of long-term postcholecystectomy symptoms (Figure 3).

We established that most persisting symptoms are likely to be caused by coexisting diseases; often, these will be nonbiliary symptoms. Detailed anamnesis and tailored diagnostic tests (such as ultrasound, gastroscopy, and colonoscopy) will provide insight in the presence of (functional) abdominal disorders. Accessible therapeutic options should confirm or rule out the diagnosis, for instance, with a test treatment with antacids or laxatives [26, 32, 35, 36, 79].

Persisting biliary pain will mainly be caused by newly formed or residual stones or SOD. These conditions can be diagnosed using abdominal or endoscopic ultrasound. Gallstones will most often be present in the CBD and can be treated by ERCP with papillotomy and stone extraction. SOD type I and II can be distinguished from other disorders by laboratory results, imaging of the biliary tree, and elevated sphincter pressure at manometry. SOD type III is difficult to distinguish from other gastrointestinal disorders, as the only criterion is biliary pain. Some literature recommends endoscopic sphincterotomy to treat SOD [15, 45]; however, recently published long-term results of the EPISOD study show that in type III SOD, endoscopic sphincterotomy was not more successful compared to sham intervention in patients with postcholecystectomy SOD type III [80, 81]. Another study recommends medical treatment, trimebutine, and nitrates taken sublingually, as success rates are similar with endoscopic sphincterotomy [82].

Newly formed symptoms will often start shortly after LC but can persist and become a long-term problem. Patients with surgical complications should therefore be monitored at the outpatient clinic to obviate persisting symptoms, and surgical, endoscopic, or medical treatment can be started timely (e.g., surgical or endoscopic intervention with a stent or dilatation for bile duct injury or antibiotics for (intra-abdominal) infections). Most incident symptoms will however be physiological. Patients with new reflux symptoms after LC (due to physiological changes in bile secretion and metabolism) can be pragmatically treated with lifestyle changes, drugs that reduce the secretion of gastric acids, prokinetic drugs, or drugs that reduce the relaxations of the esophageal sphincter, to reduce reflux and relieve symptoms. Patients with (invalidating) chronic diarrhea can be treated with a bile acid sequestrant like cholestyramine, colestipol, or colesevelam [83].

Although this study provides tools to establish and treat symptoms, of course, preventing postoperative symptoms is preferable. A prospective study showed that 56% of patients need additional health care and medical costs and costs for sick leave were approximately $916 per year per patients [10]. Improved patient selection and preoperative work-up for a LC could prevent persistent abdominal symptoms and costs.

In patients with nonspecific gallstone symptoms, the preoperative diagnostic trajectory should focus on confirming or ruling out other causes of upper abdominal symptoms and considering alternative or concomitant therapeutic options. Our research group is currently performing a multicenter prospective study (Dutch Trial Register: NTR7307) to identify the prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) in patients with gallstones. Current literature suggests prevalence of up to 60% [26, 39, 84, 85]. If such high prevalence is accurate, a large part of persistent symptoms after LC could be explained by coexistent FGID and treatment to prevent persistent symptoms could be initiated prior to surgery. A second prospective study (NTR7267) focuses on establishing the abdominal symptoms for appropriate indication of LC to prevent persistent symptoms caused by wrong surgical indication.

Additionally, shared decision-making and increased influence in choosing their preferred treatment may result in improved physical outcomes and less distress. This is illustrated for psychologically distressed patients [42] but may very well apply for other patients. Furthermore, we should consider that symptoms before and after LC may be present as part of the metabolic syndrome [86–88]. The metabolic syndrome is described as the underlying disorder for gallstones by abnormalities of insulin resistance, resulting in increased biliary cholesterol synthesis and gallstone formation [86]. LC is aimed at treating the gallstone symptoms, but the lifestyle and other comorbidities associated with the metabolic problem remain untreated. Incorporation of lifestyle changes and treatment of other aspects of the metabolic syndrome could reduce postoperative symptoms in this patient category.

The present review comes with strengths and limitations. Strengthening our study are the broad search and wide inclusion criteria to identify all possible etiologies of long-term abdominal symptoms after LC. Articles on open cholecystectomy were excluded, to prevent bias by etiologies or prevalence (such as higher surgical complications) inherent to the open aspects of the surgery, not reflecting current surgical practice. Additionally, differentiation between incident and persistent symptoms and descriptions of subgroups of etiologies were made to improve clinical applicability of the results. Ultimately, a clinical guidance was provided for physicians in the diagnostics and treatments of patients with symptoms after LC.

Limitations include the large heterogeneity of the included studies and subsequent inability to perform a quality assessment. As only a limited number of included studies reported the prevalence of described etiologies, we could not provide a meta-analysis. Subsequently, we were only able to provide the range of prevalence of the different etiologies to illustrate which etiologies are more and less common.

7. Conclusion

Postcholecystectomy symptoms have multiple etiologies and can be divided into persistent and incident symptoms. Most symptoms seem to be caused by coexistent diseases and physiological changes due to LC. Although treatment is available for most causes of persistent symptoms after gallbladder removal, optimized indication for surgery remains key.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Latenstein and Wennmacker substantially contributed to the conception and design; contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data; drafted the manuscript; finally approved the version to be published; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. de Reuver, Drenth, van Laarhoven, and de Jong interpreted the data, revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, finally approved the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: search strategy. Table S2: study characteristics of included studies. (Supplementary Materials)

References

E. A. Shaffer, “Gallstone disease: epidemiology of gallbladder stone disease,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 981–996, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Surgery DSo, Evidence-Based Guideline. Diagnostic and Treatment of Gallstones, 2016.
European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), “EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 146–181, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wittenburg, “Hereditary liver disease: gallstones,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 747–756, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Lammert, K. Gurusamy, C. W. Ko et al., “Gallstones,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 2, p. 16024, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Lamberts, M. Lugtenberg, M. M. Rovers et al., “Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 709–718, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Lamberts, B. Den Oudsten, F. Keus et al., “Tu1953 patient-reported outcomes of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis patients following cholecystectomy after at least 5 years of follow-up,” Gastroenterology, vol. 146, no. 5, article S-880, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Lamberts, B. L. den Oudsten, J. J. G. M. Gerritsen et al., “Prospective multicentre cohort study of patient-reported outcomes after cholecystectomy for uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 1402–1409, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wennmacker, M. Lamberts, J. Gerritsen et al., “Consistency of patient-reported outcomes after cholecystectomy and their implications on current surgical practice: a prospective multicenter cohort study,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 215–224, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Z. Wennmacker, M. G. W. Dijkgraaf, G. P. Westert, J. P. H. Drenth, C. J. H. M. van Laarhoven, and P. R. de Reuver, “Persistent abdominal pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with increased healthcare consumption and sick leave,” Surgery, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 661–666, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Berk, “Postcholecystectomy syndrome: a critical evaluation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1060–1074, 1958.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Feldman, “Postcholecystectomy syndrome,” Gastroenterology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 239–246, 1958.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Schofer, “Biliary causes of postcholecystectomy syndrome,” The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 406–410, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Abu Farsakh, M. Stietieh, and F. A. Abu Farsakh, “The postcholecystectomy syndrome - a role for duodenogastric reflux,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 197–201, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Jaunoo, S. Mohandas, and L. M. Almond, “Postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS),” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–17, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1006–1012, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Trondsen, O. Reiertsen, O. K. Andersen, and P. Kjaersgaard, “Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study,” The European Journal of Surgery, vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 217–221, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Sezeur and K. Akel, “Cystic duct remnant calculi after cholecystectomy,” Journal of Visceral Surgery, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. e287–e290, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chowbey, A. Sharma, A. Goswami et al., “Residual gallbladder stones after cholecystectomy: a literature review,” Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 223–230, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Phillips, M. Joseph, E. S. Dellon, I. Grimm, T. M. Farrell, and C. C. Rupp, “Surgical and endoscopic management of remnant cystic duct lithiasis after cholecystectomy-a case series,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1278–1283, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kambal, T. Richards, H. Jayamanne, Z. Sallami, A. Rasheed, and T. Lazim, “Instrumental detection of cystic duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 215–218, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bani Hani, A. R. al Manasra, and H. Qandeel, “Passage of gallstones into common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it the surgeon’s responsibility?” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 110–112, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Gronroos, M. M. Haapamaki, and R. Gullichsen, “Effect of the diameter of the common bile duct on the incidence of bile duct stones in patients with recurrent attacks of right epigastric pain after cholecystectomy,” The European Journal of Surgery, vol. 167, no. 10, pp. 767–769, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chowbey, V. Soni, A. Sharma, R. Khullar, and M. Baijal, “Residual gallstone disease - laparoscopic management,” The Indian Journal of Surgery, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 220–225, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ye, J. Liu, Y. Tang et al., “Endoscopic minimal invasive cholecystolithotomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of cholecystolithiasis in China: a meta-analysis,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 13, pp. 227–238, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Mertens, J. De Vries, V. P. W. Scholtes, P. Jansen, and J. A. Roukema, “Prospective 6 weeks follow-up post-cholecystectomy: the predictive value of pre-operative symptoms,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 304–311, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Mjaland, H. E. Hogevold, and T. Buanes, “Standard preoperative assessment can improve outcome after cholecystectomy,” The European Journal of Surgery, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Thistle, G. F. Longstreth, Y. Romero et al., “Factors that predict relief from upper abdominal pain after cholecystectomy,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 891–896, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Wanjura, P. Lundstrom, J. Osterberg, I. Rasmussen, B. M. Karlson, and G. Sandblom, “Gastrointestinal quality-of-life after cholecystectomy: indication predicts gastrointestinal symptoms and abdominal pain,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 3075–3081, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. van der Velden, M. Y. Berger, H. J. Bonjer, K. Brakel, and J. S. Lameris, “Can sonographic signs predict long-term results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 46, no. 30, pp. 3063–3067, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Niv and G. M. Fraser, “Is there a need for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before cholecystectomy,” Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 536–539, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Harju, S. Aspinen, P. Juvonen, H. Kokki, and M. Eskelinen, “Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 2512–2516, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Carraro, D. El Mazloum, and F. Bihl, “Health-related quality of life outcomes after cholecystectomy,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 45, pp. 4945–4951, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Bielefeldt, “Black bile of melancholy or gallstones of biliary colics: historical perspectives on cholelithiasis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 2623–2634, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fahlke, K. Ridwelski, T. Manger, R. Grote, and H. Lippert, “Diagnostic workup before laparoscopic cholecystectomy--which diagnostic tools should be used?” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 48, no. 37, pp. 59–65, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Y. Berger, T. C. olde Hartman, and A. M. Bohnen, “Abdominal symptoms: do they disappear after cholecystectomy?” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1723–1728, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Halldestam, E. Kullman, and K. Borch, “Defined indications for elective cholecystectomy for gallstone disease,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 620–626, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Porcelli, D. Lorusso, G. J. Taylor, and R. M. Bagby, “The influence of alexithymia on persistent symptoms of dyspepsia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lorusso, P. Porcelli, F. Pezzolla et al., “Persistent dyspepsia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The influence of psychological factors,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 653–658, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. N. Jorgensen, J. Rosenberg, H. Al-Tayar, S. Assaadzadeh, F. Helgstrand, and T. Bisgaard, “Randomized clinical trial of single-versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 347–355, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Borly, I. B. Andersen, L. Bardram et al., “Preoperative prediction model of outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1144–1152, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Stefaniak, A. Vingerhoets, D. Babinska et al., “Psychological factors influencing results of cholecystectomy,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 127–132, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Mertens, J. A. Roukema, V. P. W. Scholtes, and J. De Vries, “Trait anxiety predicts outcome 6 weeks after cholecystectomy. A prospective follow-up study,” Annals of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 264–269, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Behar, E. Corazziari, M. Guelrud, W. Hogan, S. Sherman, and J. Toouli, “Functional gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi disorders,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1498–1509, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cicala, F. I. Habib, F. Fiocca, N. Pallotta, and E. Corazziari, “Increased sphincter of Oddi basal pressure in patients affected by gall stone disease: a role for biliary stasis and colicky pain?” Gut, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 414–417, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. W. Han, J. K. Lee, and K. H. Hong, “Effect of rowachol on prevention of postcholecystectomy syndrome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 29, pp. 149-150, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Barthet, “Dysfonction du sphincter d’Oddi: attention danger...,” Acta Endoscopica, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 285–292, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Greenfield, A. S. Azziz, A. J. Jung, B. M. Yeh, R. Aslam, and F. V. Coakley, “Imaging late complications of cholecystectomy,” Clinical Imaging, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 763–767, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Diculescu, S. Iacob, R. Iacob, D. Sclifos, R. Ionescu, and A. Oproiu, “Is oral bile acid dissolution a better alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones?” Annals of Fundeni Hospital, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Corazziari, E. A. Shaffer, W. J. Hogan, S. Sherman, and J. Toouli, “Functional disorders of the biliary tract and pancreas,” Gut, vol. 45, Supplement 2, pp. ii48–ii54, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. George and J. Baillie, “Biliary and gallbladder dyskinesia,” Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 322–327, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Wald, “Functional biliary-type pain - update and controversies,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 39, Supplement 3, pp. S217–S222, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. B. Lund and A. B. Winick, “Complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the role of interventional radiology in patient management,” Seminars in Interventional Radiology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 263–275, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Mulvihill, “Surgical management of gallstone disease and postoperative complications,” Seminars in Gastrointestinal Disease, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 237–244, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Yamaner, Y. Bilsel, T. Bulut et al., “Endoscopic diagnosis and management of complications following surgery for gallstones,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1685–1690, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. L. Bennett, “Evaluating patients with right upper quadrant pain,” Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1093–1130, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pazouki, A. Abdollahi, M. Mehrabi Bahar et al., “Evaluation of the incidence of complications of lost gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 213–215, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Nayak, C. O. Menias, and G. Gayer, “Dropped gallstones: spectrum of imaging findings, complications and diagnostic pitfalls,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 86, no. 1028, article 20120588, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Cafarella, “Lost gallstones--a small but real complication,” AORN Journal, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 392–405, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ros and E. Nilsson, “Abdominal pain and patient overall and cosmetic satisfaction one year after cholecystectomy: outcome of a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 773–777, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Vander Velpen, S. M. Shimi, and A. Cuschieri, “Outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease and effect of surgical access: laparoscopic v open approach,” Gut, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1448–1451, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Victorzon, M. Lundin, C. Haglund, P. J. Roberts, and I. Kellokumpu, “Short and long term outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 259–263, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
R. G. Wilson and I. M. C. Macintyre, “Symptomatic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” The British Journal of Surgery, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 439–441, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Peterli, L. Merki, J. P. Schuppisser, C. Ackermann, U. Herzog, and P. Tondelli, “Postcholecystektomiebeschwerden ein Jahr nach laparoskopischer Cholecystektomie Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Untersuchung von 253 Patienten,” Der Chirurg, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. F. Buess, U. Klein, K. Manncke, H. Raestrup, C. G. Schmedt, and H. D. Becker, “Follow-up results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 982–989, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Niranjan, S. Chumber, and A. K. Kriplani, “Symptomatic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Tropical Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 144–148, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
B. M. Ure, H. Troidl, W. Spangenberger et al., “Long-term results after laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 267–270, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. F. Altomare, M. T. Rotelli, and N. Palasciano, “Diet after cholecystectomy,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 24, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Jones, D. L. Dunnegan, and N. J. Soper, “The influence of intraoperative gallbladder perforation on long-term outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 977–980, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fisher, D. C. Spilias, and L. K. Tong, “Diarrhoea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and main determinants,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 482–486, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Uyanikoglu, F. Akyuz, F. Ermis et al., “Does cholecystectomy increase the esophageal alkaline reflux? Evaluation by impedance-pH technique,” Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 187–193, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Farsakh, E. Roweily, M. Steitieh, R. Butchoun, and B. Khalil, “Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gall stones before and after cholecystectomy-a longitudinal-study,” Gut, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 675–678, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. N. Ahmad, W. N. Ahmad, W. K. Aalam, S. M. Ahmad, and K. S. Hussain, “Duodenogastric reflux, an important cause of post cholecystectomy symptoms,” JK Practitioner, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 188–190, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
C. R. Weinert, D. Arnett, Jacobs D Jr, and R. L. Kane, “Relationship between persistence of abdominal symptoms and successful outcome after cholecystectomy,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 160, no. 7, pp. 989–995, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shin, D. Choi, K. G. Lee, H. S. Choi, and Y. Park, “Association between dietary intake and postlaparoscopic cholecystectomic symptoms in patients with gallbladder disease,” The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 829–836, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Isherwood, K. Oakland, and A. Khanna, “A systematic review of the aetiology and management of post cholecystectomy syndrome,” The Surgeon, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Reggiani, A. Anzani, L. Erenbourg, U. Fontana, B. Portaleone, and M. Vercesi, “Does post-cholecystectomy syndrome exist? Epidemiologic features and therapeutic effects of ursodeoxycholic acid,” Minerva Medica, vol. 77, no. 38, pp. 1755–1762, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
A. C. Anand, R. Sharma, B. M. Kapur, and R. K. Tandon, “Analysis of symptomatic patients after cholecystectomy: is the term post-cholecystectomy syndrome an anachronism?” Tropical Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 126–131, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
K. J. Nakano, K. Waxman, D. Rimkus, and J. Blaustein, “Does gallbladder ejection fraction predict pathology after elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis?” The American Surgeon, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 1052–1056, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
P. B. Cotton, Q. Pauls, J. Keith et al., “The EPISOD study: long-term outcomes,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 205–210, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Costamagna, “Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: the never-ending story has come to a conclusion,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 211-212, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Vitton, S. Ezzedine, J. M. Gonzalez, M. Gasmi, J. C. Grimaud, and M. Barthet, “Medical treatment for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: can it replace endoscopic sphincterotomy?” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 1610–1615, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Barkun, J. Love, M. Gould, H. Pluta, and A. H. Steinhart, “Bile acid malabsorption in chronic diarrhea: pathophysiology and treatment,” Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 653–659, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ibrarullah, B. R. Mittal, D. K. Aagrawal, B. K. Das, and S. P. Kaushik, “Gastric-emptying in patients with gallstone disease with or without dyspepsia-effect of cholecystectomy,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 247–250, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schmidt, K. Sondenaa, J. A. Dumot et al., “Post-cholecystectomy symptoms were caused by persistence of a functional gastrointestinal disorder,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1365–1372, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zanlungo, A. Rigotti, J. F. Miquel, and F. Nervi, “Abnormalities of lipid metabolism, gallstone disease and gallbladder function,” Clinical Lipidology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 315–325, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Y. Chen, Q. H. Qiao, S. C. Zhang, Y. H. Chen, G. Q. Chao, and L. Z. Fang, “Metabolic syndrome and gallstone disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 31, pp. 4215–4220, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. C. Lin, Y. W. Yang, M. F. Wu et al., “The association of metabolic syndrome and its factors with gallstone disease,” BMC Family Practice, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 138, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Carmen S. S. Latenstein et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

72677

Downloads

2910

Citations