Review Article
Same-Day Regimen as an Alternative to Split Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Table 1
Characteristics of the studies included.
| Author | Journal | Year | Laxative | Type of study | Scale | Same-day (total pts) | Split (total pts) | Compliance same-day | Compliance split | Same-day good prep | Same-day fair prep | Split good prep | Split fair prep |
| Matro et al. | AJG | 2010 | PEG vs. PEG | RCT | Own | 61 | 54 | 52 (85.2%) | 39 (72.2%) | 56 | 5 | 51 | 3 | Longcroft-Wheaton and Bhandari | J CLIN GASTR | 2012 | PicoNA vs. PicoNA | Prospective-NR | Own | 132 | 95 | UK | UK | 130 | 2 | 85 | 10 | de Leone et al. | WJGE | 2013 | PEG + bisacodyl vs. PEG | RCT | B | 78 | 76 | 70 (89.7%) | 71 (93.4%) | 70 | 8 | 70 | 6 | Seo et al. | Digestion | 2013 | PEG vs. PEG | RCT | O | 97 | 100 | 97 (100%) | 100 (100%) | 72 | 25 | 75 | 25 | Kim et al. | Scand J Gastr | 2014 | PEG vs. PEG | RCT | O | 50 | 50 | 39 (78%) | 47 (94%) | 41 | 9 | 42 | 8 | Kim et al. | Scand J Gastr | 2014 | PEG vs. PicoNA | RCT | O | 50 | 50 | 39 (78%) | 48 (96%) | 41 | 9 | 46 | 4 | Kim et al. | Scand J Gastr | 2014 | PEG vs. PicoNA | RCT | O | 50 | 50 | 39 (78%) | 50 (100%) | 41 | 9 | 41 | 9 | Kotwal et al. | J CLIN GASTR | 2014 | PEG vs. PEG | RCT | O | 51 | 52 | 43 (84.3%) | 48 (92.3%) | | | | | Kang et al. | IR | 2014 | PicoNA vs. PEG | RCT | O | 97 | 99 | 97 (100%) | 99 (100%) | 60 | 37 | 71 | 28 | Chan et al. | WJG | 2014 | PEG vs. PEG | RCT | B | 152 | 143 | 143 (94%) | 142 (99.3%) | 140 | 12 | 138 | 5 | Tellez-Avila | DE | 2014 | PEG vs. PEG | RCT | B | 59 | 61 | UK | UK | UK | UK | UK | UK | Shah et al. | WJGE | 2014 | PEG vs. PEG | RCT | O | 103 | 97 | UK | UK | UK | UK | UK | UK |
|
|
PicoNA = sodium picosulphate; PEG = polyethylene glycol; PTS = patients; RCT = randomized clinical trial; NR = nonrandomized; SCALE B = Boston Bowel Preparation Scale; O = Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale; UK = unknown.
|