The Impact of Sedation on Adenoma Detection Rate and Cecal Intubation Rate in Colonoscopy

Table 4

Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for cecal intubation rate.

Variable	Model 1 ()		Model 2 ()
	OR (95% CI)	value	OR (95% CI)	value
Patient factor
Sedation
Without sedation	Reference		Reference
With sedation	1.560 (1.446-1.683)	<0.001	1.601 (1.482-1.729)	<0.001
Bowel preparation
Good	Reference		Reference
Not good	1.170 (1.016-1.346)	0.029	1.161 (1.008-1.336)	0.038
Patient factor
Gender
Male	Reference		Reference
Female	1.452 (1.358-1.553)	<0.001	1.451 (1.357-1.551)	<0.001
Age
<50	Reference		Reference
50-59	0.528 (0.474-0.587)	<0.001	0.528 (0.475-0.588)	<0.001
60-69	0.434 (0.393-0.479)	<0.001	0.436 (0.394-0.481)	<0.001
≥70	0.224 (0.202-0.249)	<0.001	0.224 (0.202-0.249)	<0.001
Endoscopist factor
Gender
Male	Reference		Reference
Female	1.285 (1.192-1.385)	<0.001	1.271 (1.179-1.371)	<0.001
Age
<40	Reference		Reference
≥40	0.549 (0.509-0.592)	<0.001	0.565 (0.523-0.611)	<0.001
Total number of colonoscopies
≤500	—	—	Reference
>500	—	—	0.839 (0.763-0.921)	<0.001

Model 1, all endoscopists with their colonoscopy data were enrolled; model 2, 14 endoscopists with complete colonoscopy data during career in database were enrolled.