Review Article
Latest Advances in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
Table 1
Comparison of perioperative outcomes among OISR, LISR, and RISR.
| | OISR | LISR | RISR |
| | 264 | 586 | 226 | | Age (y) | 58.7 (12.0) | 60.7 (11.4) | 58.6 (11.8) | | Sex (male/female) | 175/89 | 371/215 | 159/67 | | PCRT (%) | 29.4 | 36.8 | 67.3 | | Distance from anal verge (cm) | 4.3 (0.7) | 3.7 (1.0) | 3.3 (0.9) | | Operation time (min) | 296.6 (78.1) | 288.1 (79.3) | 308.1 (77.5) | | Blood loss (ml) | 210.7 (277.3) | 99.4 (128.0) | 128.3 (143.8) | | Protective stoma (%) | 30.0 | 44.1 | 53.3 | | Hospital stay (d) | 16.0 (6.4) | 11.4 (5.9) | 10.9 (4.0) | | Complication | | | | | Wound infection | 6 | 5 | 3 | | Anastomotic leakage | 8 | 17 | 12 | | Anastomotic stricture | 3 | 10 | 5 | | Bleeding | 0 | 1 | 2 | | Ileus | 7 | 15 | 12 | | Chylous ascites | 1 | 2 | 0 | | Urinary retention | 3 | 18 | 10 | | Pneumonia | 8 | 6 | 0 | | Rectovaginal fistula | 2 | 7 | 2 | | Intra-abdominal abscess | 3 | 6 | 3 |
|
|
|
