Gastric Cancer Screening Methods: A Comparative Study of the Chinese New Gastric Cancer Screening Score and Kyoto Classification of Gastritis

Table 5

Comparison of gastric cancer results between the two scoring methods.

Scoring method/risk stratification	GC	values	Early GC	values
Chinese new gastric cancer screening scoring system (Li’s score)
Low risk (No. 585)	18 (3.08%)^¶	<0.001^a	2 (0.34%)	<0.05^a
Medium risk (No. 93)	18 (19.35%)^★		3 (3.23%)
High risk (No. 24)	4 (16.67%)	<0.05^c	1 (4.17%)	<0.001^c
Kyoto classification of gastritis scoring system
Low risk (No. 384)	2 (0.52%)	<0.001^a	0	<0.05^a
Medium risk (No. 171)	10 (5.85%)	<0.001^b	3 (1.75%)
High risk (No. 147)	28 (19.05%)	<0.001^c	3 (2.04%)	<0.05^c

^aLow-risk group vs. medium-risk group; ^bmedium-risk group vs. high-risk group; ^chigh-risk group vs. low-risk group; ^¶low-risk group: Chinese new gastric cancer screening scoring system vs. Kyoto Classification of Gastritis scoring system, ; ^★medium-risk group: Chinese new gastric cancer screening scoring system vs. Kyoto Classification of Gastritis scoring system, . No.: case number; GC: gastric cancer.