|
No. | Author, year, and country | Design | Purpose | Sample/population | Location | Method/intervention | Findings |
|
1 | Cox, Hoang, Barnett, Cross, (2020), Australia | Qualitative | Investigated how a cohort of Aboriginal men consider the value of shed participation | A total of 10 Aboriginal men from a single men’s shed | Rural | Semistructured interviews | Four themes; belonging, hope mentoring, and shared illness experiences |
2 | Ford, Scholz, & Lu, (2015), Australia | Quantitative | Examined health benefits of men’s sheds through the lens of social identity theory | A total of 322 men’s shed’s users in Australia | Mixed | Survey of four quality of life domains and their willingness to take health advise offered at sheds regarding physical, psychological, environmental, and social indicators | Shed participation is associated with positive health benefits and are useful sites for health promotion activities |
3 | Mahoney, Wilson, Buchanan, Milbourn, Hoey & Cordier, (2020), Australia | Mixed methods | The experiences of the older mentors from men’s sheds working with young adult men in an intergenerational program | 16 mentors (older men) | Mixed | Mentees paired with a men’s shed mentor and attended the shed at least once per week over 6 months. Case managers are present for graded support | Significant improvements in mental health. No significant change in physical health and generativity |
learning together through a relational and practical routine was observed |
4 | Milbourn, Mahoney, Trimboli, Hoey, Cordier, Buchanan & Wilson, (2020), Australia | Qualitative | The experiences and occupational wellbeing of young adult men with intellectual disability in an intergenerational men’s she program | 8 mentees (young men with intellectual disabilities) 5 parents of mentees | Urban | Mentees paired with a men’s shed mentor and attended the shed at least once per week over 6 months. Case managers are present for graded support. Interviews with mentees and parents | A positive impact on the mentees and their families was reported, including opportunities for social interaction, skill development, knowledge, validation, and self-belief |
5 | Misan, Oosterbroek & Wilson, (2017), Australia | Quantitative | Explore the health concerns, interests, help-seeking, and health-seeking behaviours and the preferences for receipt of such information | 11 men’s sheds 154 men’s shed members | Rural | Survey | Key health issues were mainly age-related chronic conditions with the regular medical practitioner remaining the preference to receive health information. Knowledge of reproductive and psychological health was lacking. Hands-on or kinaesthetic approaches to information was preferred |
6 | Rahja, Newton Scanlan, Wilson, & Cordier, (2016), Australia | Qualitative | Provide insight into the outcomes of a mentoring program comparing characteristics of different programs as beneficial for a young male’s transition into adulthood | Sample 4 young people and 18 men who were mentors and members of the men’s shed | Urban | Interviews and case study descriptions | Mentor attitude towards the mentee’s, freedom to make independent choices and the nature and perceived usefulness of the project were considered the most significant characteristics of these programs |
7 | Southcombe, Cavanagh, & Bartram, (2015a), Australia | Qualitative | Investigation into capacity building at the community level in aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men’s groups and sheds | A total of 45 men from urban, regional and remote communities from 15 groups/sheds | Mixed | Yarning circles focus groups, semistructured interview technique | Capacity building results in better health outcomes and educates and empowers men to improve their social, cultural emotional and economic well-being. It helps men better connect with family and community |
8 | Southcombe, Cavanagh, & Bartram, (2015b), Australia | Qualitative | Investigate the influence of charismatic leadership on social connectiveness or retired men | A total of 305 men from 60 men’s sheds in urban and regional areas across every state and territory of Australia | Mixed | Focus groups (yarning circles) semistructured interviews with shed leaders, men members, and healthcare workers | Links between charismatic leadership and social connectiveness and well-being. Overall, the study found that charismatic leadership, value congruence, and social connectiveness contribute to the social and emotional well-being of men |
9 | Wilson, Cordier, Ciccarelli, MacCallum, Milbourn, Vaz, Joosten, Buchanan, McAuliffe & Stancliffe, (2018), Australia | Mixed methods | Feasibility study of intergenerational mentoring program in men’s sheds for young adult males with intellectual disabilities | 5 mentees (young men with intellectual disabilities) 12 mentors (older men) | Urban | Mentees paired with two men’s shed mentors and attended the shed at least once per week (2 hrs) over 10-week period | The program presents a great “opportunity” and pose a viable option to support young people with intellectual disabilities |
10 | Wilson, Cordier, Parsons, Vaz & Ciccarelli (2019), Australia | Quantitative | Explore the social inclusion and health promotion activities in men’s sheds | 305 men’s sheds | Mixed | International men’s shed survey of health promotion and social activities undertaken in the men’s sheds across Australia | Men’s sheds are 37% “active” in health promotion and 70% “active” in social inclusivity |
11 | Wilson, Cordier, Milbourn, Mahoney, Hoey & Buchanan, (2020), Australia | Quantitative | Explore the outcomes of intergenerational mentors in men’s sheds for young adult men with intellectual disabilities | 18 mentees (young men with intellectual disabilities) | Mixed | Mentees paired with a men’s shed mentor and attended the shed at least once per week over 6 months. Case managers present for graded support | Improved community connection and quality of life was observed in the mentees |
There was no significant difference in the loneliness, wellbeing, or workplace adjustments of the mentees |
|