Review Article

Heuristics, Biases, and Decisions in Resource Allocation for Home Care Packages under Consumer Directed Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Table 5

Article metadata.

AuthorsType of studyJournalAcademic fieldsSetting (country)Quality appraisal tool

Carpenter and Yoon [24]Qualitative (narrative review)Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesScienceUnited StatesSANRA
Duner et al. [25]Mixed (survey and qualitative interviews)Ageing and societyInterdisciplinary, international study of agingSwedenMMAT mixed methods
Elbel et al. [26]Quantitative nonrandom (convenience sample choice experiment)Journal of Health Services Research and PolicyHealth services/PolicyUnited StatesMMAT quantitative randomised controlled trial
Gill and Cameron [27]QualitativeHealth and Social Care in the CommunityCommunity health careAustraliaMMAT qualitative
Gill et al. [13]Qualitative (semistructured interviews)BMC GeriatricsGerontologyAustraliaMMAT qualitative
Hillcoat-Nalletamby [28]Qualitative (interviews on randomly selected subset)Ageing and SocietyInterdisciplinary, international study of agingUnited KingdomMMAT qualitative
McWilliam et al. [29]Quantitative nonrandom (analysis of data sample and surveys)Care Management JournalsPrograms and policies for home-bound frail elderlyCanadaMMAT quantitative (nonrandomised)
Rahja et al. [15]QualitativeAustralian Journal of Social IssuesInterdisciplinary social policy debateAustraliaMMAT qualitative
Rowland and Joyce [30]Qualitative (semi-structured interviews)Australasian Journal of AgeingSocial research and policy; gerontologyAustraliaMMAT qualitative
Tymula et al. [31]Quantitative nonrandom (behavioural experiment)PNASPsychological and cognitive science economic sciencesUnited StatesMMAT quantitative (nonrandomised)
Wang et al. [32]Quantitative randomised controlled trial (discrete choice experiment)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthPublic healthChinaMMAT quantitative (RCT)