|
Source | Community/population | Participants | Type of knowledge shared | How knowledge is shared/mobilised | Who is doing KMb? | Function/purpose of KMb | Evidence of change |
|
Arulrajah and Steele [42] | Medical students/victims of human trafficking | Medical schools/students | Curriculum content on human trafficking | Training and education in medical curriculum | Academics | Improve training and education of medical students (HT) | Call for action: improved awareness of the gaps in the provision, context, and delivery of human trafficking education in the current curriculum for medical students in the UK |
|
Bellman et al. [43] | Nurses working at advanced level of practice (adult infection control) | Academic and practice | Knowledge to action framework | Publication on knowledge transfer methods and role in improving evidence-based nursing care | Academic and practitioners | To learn if knowledge transfer programmes, structures, frameworks, and theories are working, and if not, why not | Call for systematic use of KT frameworks to improve the utilisation of research in practice |
|
Botham [44] | Health visitors and school nurses | Academic (HV) | Literature review on effectiveness of safeguarding children supervision | Published literature review (professional journal) | Academic HV | To examine and define safeguarding supervision in relation to both health visitors and school nurses | Supervision remains undefined |
|
Crawford and L’Hoiry [45] | Policing and children’s safeguarding partners in Leeds | Social work (20), the police (15), health (7), youth services (5), and third sector organisations (3) | Examining the best elements of “boundary work” for communities of practice | Leadership relating to strategic goals of shared commitment and purpose | Policing leadership, embedded in aspirations towards community of practice | Build a safeguarding community of practice in Leeds | Evidenced knowledge brokering. The cluster model colocated “the front door” and mature networked relations of trust and open conflict management. Opportunities for critical reflection on practices and possibilities for cultural transformation to effect change. Cultivate creative “boundary work” rooted in shared experiences |
|
Dodsworth [46] | Safeguarding children’s board/practitioners | Safeguarding professionals, Northamptonshire | Toolkit (CSE) designed by Northamptonshire Safeguarding Children Board | National guidance overview | Local safeguarding board | To collate key research, practice tools and protocols to increase awareness of CSE | Useful guide |
Local response (template) | Not evaluated |
Individual agency responses |
|
Domac and Haider [47] | Patients and service users of health and social care services | Social workers, two occupational therapists, a nurse and a safeguarding adult trainer | Personal experiences of professionals regarding past safeguarding training and the way in which meaning arises in these experiences | Two-part qualitative semi structured interviews to explore adult safeguarding training needs | Academics | To develop an interagency safeguarding adults training pathway that will allow health and local authorities to deliver training jointly and to learn together | Developed an interprofessional safeguarding training path |
|
Drewett et al. [48] | Children and families at the point of contact with healthcare practitioners | International conference attendees with an interest in using technology to influence behavioural change. 70 professionals from the pharmaceutical industry, the charity sector, health psychologists, ethicists, medical doctors, academics, and computer scientists. In the first part of the study, GPs from local surgeries | Expert views on the use of virtual reality based safeguarding training | A panel discussion held at the Centre for Behaviour Change, 4th Annual Conference at University College London on 21 February 2018 | Academic research | To improve role-play training in medical professions, to overcome ethical issues related to engaging children in role play in safeguarding training | The panel discussion itself, recognition of shortcomings (cost and more realistic VR needed), previous GP’s responses that participation made them aware of missed safeguarding cues |
|
Fanneran et al. [49] | Vulnerable adults in mental health services | 33 NHS mental health services | A review of self-reported practices and procedures related to safeguarding at institutional level | Cross-sectional survey with a mixed-method design | Academics and academic practitioners | To investigate the organisational structure, implementation, and development of adult safeguarding in NHS mental health services | Training and attitudes were identified as main barriers to practice, and results were used for further research to build a grounded theory of adult safeguarding in NHS mental health trusts |
|
Fleming [50] | Children and young people in health organisations | Employees of an NHS trust/a safeguarding educator | Review of actions taken to improve safeguarding training compliance in a large NHS trust | Evaluation reports and reflective review of the process | A safeguarding educator at an NHS trust | To review actions taken to improve training compliance and understanding why children and young people safeguarding training is important across the trust and professions | Compliance increased and positive responses from the evaluation forms indicating that knowledge and understanding has increased |
|
Franks and Howarth [51] | Children in health services | 4 nurse consultants who specialised in safeguarding children and six stakeholders | Personal perception of existing skills and training needs | Semistructured interviews and review of documents such as job descriptions | Academic researchers | To establish learning needs and most appropriate education strategies to prepare for the role | Developmental needs identified to ensure professional development |
|
Gibson et al. [52] | Adults at the point of contact with GP | GP safeguarding leads and authors | Practise based experience | Policy/literature summary and development of a safeguarding pathway | Practitioners and safeguarding adults leads in GPs and NHS trusts | To review the role of GPs in adult safeguarding | Practical impact not assessed; summarises policies GP surgeries should implement regarding safeguarding adults; details core competencies required of GPs regarding safeguarding adults; presents how CCGs can seek assurance from GP surgeries regarding safeguarding adults; and presents straightforward pathways for specific safeguarding adults scenarios |
|
Gilhooly et al. [53] | Banking, health professionals and older people | 20 banking and 20 health professionals | Recognising financial elder abuse | Decision cues that raise suspicions of financial abuse, how such abuse comes to the attention of professionals who do not have a statutory responsibility for safeguarding older adults, and the barriers to intervention | Banking professional, healthcare professionals | Recognising cues that enable decision making | Marked difference in the type of abuse noticed by banking and health professionals, drawing attention to the ways in which context influences the likelihood that financial abuse will be detected. The study revealed that even if professionals suspect abuse, there are barriers which prevent them acting |
|
Gough and Kerlin [54] | Older adults in residential care homes | Key informants who had strategic responsibility for implementation of MCA training and managers/deputy managers of care homes within a local authority | Practice based views of MCA training and implementation | Semistructured interviews and focus group | Academics | To evaluate the impact of MCA training within older persons’ care homes | Suggested methods of delivery of the Mental Capacity Act which offer a tailored, engaging and cost-effective alternative to conventional “away day” training sessions |
|
Hackett et al. [55] | Children with harmful sexual behaviours in any setting | 147 professionals from various health, social care, and youth justice agencies in the participating local safeguarding children’s boards | An evaluation of the effectiveness of a training course | 21-item self-report questionnaire and the knowledge and attitudes towards young people with harmful sexual behaviours scale | Academics | To evaluate effectiveness of an interagency training course | Strong evidence of overall improvements in scores on most of the scale items. Concerns raised about the small number of criminal justice professionals participating compared to child welfare professionals |
|
Heslop et al. [56] | People with intellectual disabilities | n/a | Lessons learned from a confidential inquiry into premature deaths | Document/evidence review | Academics and practitioners | To report the findings of the confidential inquiry into premature deaths of people with intellectual disabilities (CIPOLD) in relation to the Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales) (MCA) 2005 | First paper that associated a lack of adherence to MCA to premature death within a safeguarding framework and other evidence of change not explored |
|
Humphries [57] | Adults in health and social care settings | Four local authorities and partner agencies | Lessons learned for a pilot programme of peer reviews | Summary of findings from the peer reviews | Academic | To assist the improvement of safeguarding policy and practice | The pilot was successful, and the four local authorities received actionable feedback on strengths and areas for development |
|
Kirk-Batty [58] | Children at the point of contact with a midwife | Practicing midwife | Literature review and experience-based reflection | Literature review | Midwife and practitioner | To explore safeguarding practice from a midwifery perspective, which includes looking again at the fundamental, basic principles of midwifery in order to advance practice further. To encourage reflection and skills improvement | Not assessed |
|
Lawrence and Banerjee [59] | Adults in care homes | 14 care home managers and 24 members of care home staff across 14 care homes | Experiences and views of changes in practice resulting from establishment of a support team | In-depth interviews | Academics | To assess the impact of the support team | The support team lead to improved development and facilitated access to training |
|
Lewis et al. [60] | Social work, healthcare (acute) | Designated safeguarding leads: doctors, nurses, midwives, and social workers | Good practice examples (joint working) | Training supported by visual prompts and awareness raising (after training) | Social work authors | To understand how acute trust paediatric and LA services work together in suspected cases of child maltreatment, and what is viewed locally as good practice | Case studies show good practice illustrates how collaborative practice identifies child maltreatment |
|
Lewis et al. [61] | Children at the point of contact with GPs | 11 general practices and 88 clinicians | Training pack was developed collaboratively using clinical, academic, front-line practitioner, service user, and training expertise in DVA, CS, and health | Intervention: through training with focus on multiagency | Academics | To fill gaps in knowledge and practice on the interface between DVA and CS revealed by the responds research | Training pack developed and successfully piloted |
Intervention evaluation: mixed methods study including observations, questionnaires, qual analysis |
|
Littler [62] | Children at the point of contact with nurses | Children’s nursing students | Academic, research-based and experience-based knowledge and skills | Integrated in the formal university curriculum | Academics through formal university education | To prepare student nurses for their career | Safeguarding education was provided consistently throughout their preregistration training over the three years, in university and practice settings, via a blended educational approach. This includes modules, individual sessions, online learning, study days, and workshops |
|
Lushey et al. [63] | Unborn children | 22 practitioners involved in prebirth assessment (five practitioners from health-related fields) | Guidance (or rather a lack of comprehensive guidance), and experienced-based knowledge (from interviews but also mentioned as the main way of gaining knowledge from other peers) | Documentary analysis of the guidance and interviews with practitioners | Academics through the article | To explore prebirth assessment | Not assessed |
Peer practitioners |
|
McGarry et al. [64] | Vulnerable adults and children at the point of contact with nurses | Preregistration nursing students | Academic, research-based and experience-based knowledge and skills | Integrated in the formal university curriculum | Academics through formal university education and safeguarding lead coordinator for education and practice | To prepare student nurses for their career | New approach to safeguarding curriculum developed with a lead coordinator role established, successfully completed by a cohort of students |
|
McGarry et al. [65] | As above | As above | As above | As above | As above | As above | As above |
|
Moore [66] | Older adults in care homes | Qualified nurses | Academic and practice-based knowledge and guidance | Integrated in formal vocational or professional qualification | Independent researcher through the article and training providers | The article: to find out whether safeguarding training prevents abuse | Recognised training for those who provide care in care and nursing homes is of limited efficacy in the prevention of abuse |
Training itself: to prepare nurses for their roles and integrate safeguarding principles in their practice |
|
Norrie et al. [67] | Adults known to social services | People who have been safeguarded and their representatives | Personal experiences of being “safeguarded” | Face-to-face interview based on 7-question survey | Academics gaining knowledge from SUs | To test the feasibility of using this survey to “seek feedback” from adults at risk about adult safeguarding services | Survey helps professionals understand SU experiences |
|
Northamptonshire Children’s Safeguarding Board [68] | Children and families in any setting | Frontline practitioners | Comprehensive, applied guide on many aspects of child neglect | Toolkit, information dense in “bite-sized” sections, with practical examples and tools for practice use | Local Safeguarding Board (multiagency) | To develop a toolkit for neglect (for local practice) | Developed evidence-based toolkit for use in local practice |
|
Northamptonshire Children’s Safeguarding Board [69] | Children in any setting | Frontline practitioners | Comprehensive, applied guide on many aspects of CSE | Toolkit, information dense, with practical examples and tools for practice use | Local Safeguarding Board (multiagency) | To develop a toolkit for CSE (for local practice) | Developed evidence-based toolkit for use in local practice |
|
Ochieng and Ward [70] | Adults at risk | Registered nurses (n = 51) working in primary or secondary care in east England | Evaluation of safeguarding of vulnerable adults CPD course | 50-item questionnaire administered online to evaluate SOVA-CPD | Academic/trainer seeking knowledge about nurses’ learning from SOVA-CPD | To provide insights into the effect of SOVA-CPD training for nurses | Nurses reported enhanced competence and skills but an impact on care limited by challenges experienced in making changes in practice settings |
|
Patrick et al. [71] | Children at risk | Healthcare assistants, nurses, dentists, and doctor | Audit to identify and address the barriers of reporting, safeguarding concerns amongst the hospital team | Audit questionnaire to review child safeguarding training courses | Academic practitioners seeking knowledge about existing child safeguarding training | To review current and training and identify required modifications to programme | Best approaches identified are (i) focused training on diagnosis and local protocols, (ii) bespoke teaching for specific specialties, (iii) exploring modern methods of learning, and (iv) use of structured forms and local policies familiar to clinicians |
|
Peckover and Golding [72] | Children and people at risk of domestic abuse | Multiagency teams | Evaluation of activities to improve domestic abuse/safeguarding children practice | Telephone interviews with project participants, analysis of case mapping, and project reports | Academics reporting on a funded research project conducted by voluntary sector organisation in LAs | To share learning from project, to provide recommendations for improving multiagency work to achieve better outcomes for women and children experiencing domestic abuse | Not assessed |
|
Phair and Heath [73] | Older people in formal care setting | Readers of this article | Codified information about safeguarding legislation and policy | Reading article | Nurse/safeguarding experts | To inform readers | Not assessed |
|
Phelan [74] | Care home residents | Readers of this article | Literature summary and formal codified knowledge on safeguarding issues | Reading article | Academic | To inform readers | Not assessed |
|
Pike et al. [75] | Adults at risk | H&S staff and volunteers, Cornwall | Basics of safeguarding (and linking with MCA and EDI) | E-learning for basics, face-to-face for advanced course | Educators from practice and academia | To provide safeguarding training to multiagency staff groups including statutory, independent and voluntary sectors | Not assessed at the time of publication |
|
Pike et al. [76] | Primary care, adult social care | Healthcare workers and social workers | Safeguarding adults from abuse | Training transfer | Academics and social work | To clarify the relationship between safeguarding adults training, staff knowledge and confidence | Training contributed to an approximately 20 per cent increase in knowledge and a ceiling effect was noted. Confidence linked knowledge and action. More confident staff offered more sophisticated responses regarding improving safeguarding processes |
|
Plastow and Lowenhoff [77] | Clients of HVs | HV practice teachers, mentors, and students | Learning from SCRs | “Snakes and ladders” game with cards conveying learnings from SCRs and examples of good practice | Local CYP lead + PH expert | To produce a practice focused, portable and interactive resources for use by HV students | Qualitative feedback: (i) useful resource, (ii) works with different learning styles, and (iii) supports service delivery and performance indicators but not yet any “hard” evidence of this |
|
Preston-Shoot [78] | LSAB | LSAB | How organisations have worked together, and how local safeguarding adults board (LSABs) have supported and scrutinised their collaboration | Incorporating knowledge of national and local geography into SCRs | Academic | To draw on systemic and psychodynamic theories to subject published serious case reviews (SCRs) involving self-neglect to a deeper level of scrutiny, in order to understand how complex contexts impact on self-neglect work | Supports systemic theory: how practitioners work with adults who self-neglect and simultaneously are shaped by that work. This adds to the practice, management, and organisational evidence base for working with adults who self-neglect |
Individuals and populations who self-neglect |
|
Preston-Shoot [79] | Vulnerable adults in any settings | None | Practise-based and experience-based knowledge derived from the reviews | Review of how SARs are used and to extract knowledge on self-neglect cases | Academics and practitioners (safeguarding adults boards) | To update the core data set of self-neglect safeguarding adult reviews (SARs) and accompanying thematic analysis, and to address the challenge of change | Contributes new perspectives to the process of following up SARs by using the findings and recommendations systematically within a framework designed to embed change in policy and practice |
|
Preston-Shoot [80] | Adult safeguarding specialists LSAB | SABs | SARS and thematic literature review | Secondary data analysis: updates to SARS | Academic | Update the core data set of self-neglect safeguarding adult reviews (SARs) and explore the degree to which SARs draw upon available research and learning from other completed reviews | Answering “why” question (partially) builds on what is known from SARS about the components of effective practice |
|
Simic et al. [81] | Adults: independent sector services | Local authority staff and independent sector domiciliary and residential care providers | Evaluation of key organisational processes in managing safeguarding | Telephone survey and focus groups with staff | Local safeguarding experts | To better understand current organisational processes and how these may be improved | As a result of knowledge generated, guiding principles for practice established and practice challenges identified |
|
Smickle [82] | Nurses safeguarding children and young people | Safeguarding lead/specialist NHS) | Supervision frameworks | Supervisory models and relationships | Safeguarding lead in NHS | To better improve offer safeguarding supervision to front-line colleagues with case management responsibilities for vulnerable children and young people | 12 supervisors provided feedback, nine months after completing a nationally accredited child protection supervision skills course, on how they were using their new skills and knowledge in clinical practice |
|
Spencer-Lane [83] | Health and social care professionals safeguarding adults | Lawyer: academic | Legal and regulatory frameworks | Legal updates on mid staffs inquiry, impact of professional regulation) | Lawyer: academic | Implementing policy: to consider the final report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry and the law commission’s review of health and social care professional regulation, and how these will impact on the professional regulation bodies | Not evaluated |
Author influences policies that relate to and affect healthcare |
Responsible for the UK Law Commissions’ review of the regulation of health and social care professionals |
|
Stalker [84] | Deaf and disabled children | Multiprofessionals | Case studies from practice | Case scenario learning using multimedia CD and DVD | Academic and practitioners | Disseminate best practice through resource review | Not evaluated |
Professional training |
|
Stevens and cook [85] | Adults and children at risk | Adult nursing students | Students’ assignments | Review of nursing student reflective assignments | Local safeguarding practitioner + learning facilitator | To identify safeguarding concerns relating to vulnerable adults and explore implementation of safeguarding policy and procedures in practice | Audit tool to evaluate the knowledge of preregistration students was developed. Safeguarding adults’ policies implemented in one academic institution |
|
Stupple et al. [86] | Vulnerable adults | Clinical staff, safeguarding and governance experts, and local multiagency safeguarding hub (MASH) | Literature and clinical practice experience | Not specified | Clinical staff, safeguarding and governance experts, local multiagency safeguarding hub (MASH) | To develop a safeguarding tracker tool | Safeguarding tracker tool was developed. Minimal evaluation was reported |
|
Szilassy et al. [87] | Domestic violence and child safeguarding | General practice staff | DV and safeguarding policy and practice | Synthesised evidence from literature reviews, mapping of available training and qualitative data from general practice combined with DV and safeguarding policy and practice used to develop training programme | Multidisciplinary research team guided by professional and service user experts | To develop an evidence-based training programme for primary care | Evidence based responds training programme; 2-hour training designed for individual general practice teams delivered on practice premises |
|
Thacker et al. [88] | Social services/social work | Social work authors | Secondary research: practice review of literature including SARS/SCRs | Disseminated through publication | Practitioners (social work) | Suggesting “professional curiosity” is an element of safeguarding effectiveness | No |
|
Theakstone-Owen [89] | Neonates | Readers of this article | Current legislation which guides practice, using a case study to illustrate areas of interagency working | Reading article | Single author: speciality not specified | To examine interdisciplinary approaches to information sharing and collaboration in safeguarding | Not assessed |
|
Willow [90] | Teenagers with lived experience of care | Teenagers academic | Film made by teenagers explaining their experience and hopes for safeguarding interventions/care | Voice of the child DVD training resource | Teenagers with lived experience of care | Disseminate lived experience through a training resource made by teenagers | Not evaluated |
|
Wyllie and Batley [91] | Children’s nursing | Students/children’s nursing | Situations where children may have been subject to abuse or neglect | Simulated case learning | Impact of simulated learning on decision making and performance | Improve learning outcomes for safeguarding in children nursing | Yes. Fidelity of simulation design. Evidence from students’ accounts suggests an increase in their level of confidence in matters relating to safeguarding practice to the extent that they had felt able to challenge and question more senior colleagues and staff |
Theoretical knowledge and practical skills for safe practice | Safeguarding lead and child health nurse lecturer |
|
Yoeli et al. [92] | Adult safeguarders | Lay members | Scenario learning using forum theatre to elicit responses | Forum theatre frameworks (scenario) | Academic and social work | To explore how a variety of professional and lay groups understood, related to and engaged with how the Care Act (2014) defines and describes “adult safeguarding” | Not evaluated |
Social workers |
Health care practitioners |
|