Assessment of Urban Blue-Green Space Landscape Ecological Health Based on the GST-AHP-TOPSIS Composite Model

Table 5

Percentage of LEH usage satisfaction evaluation for urban blue-green spaces.

Evaluation indicators	Scoring criteria (proportion)
	Very dissatisfied 1 point (%)	Dissatisfied 2 point (%)	Neutral 3 point (%)	Satisfied 4 point (%)	Very satisfied 5 point (%)
: Forest coverage rate	3.0	25.0	36.5	24.8	10.7
: Green area coverage rate	3.3	30.0	44.0	16.3	6.4
: Temperature regulation capability	0.5	3.5	45.8	23.0	27.2
: Air humidity regulation	1.0	3.3	40.0	43.0	12.7
: CO2 absorption capacity	1.6	18.5	22.0	49.8	8.1
: Distribution of green areas	5.5	3.8	39.8	37.5	13.4
: Species richness	0.0	12.5	46.0	31.8	9.7
: Wetland conservation level	0.0	7.0	52.5	33.5	7.0
: Diversity index	6.0	13.0	42.8	37.5	0.7
: Natural landscape integrity	0.2	19.0	29.5	34.0	17.3
: Water quality health	5.5	18.5	37.5	30.0	8.5
: Ecosystem services	1.3	7.0	39.4	47.8	4.5
: Species richness	0.3	7.2	46.0	45.3	1.2
: River and lake health	0.3	14.0	48.3	29.8	7.6
: Water accessibility	2.0	7.2	43.5	36.8	10.5
: Pollutant adsorption	9.5	14.5	36.5	33.8	5.7
: Wastewater treatment efficiency	10.4	36.0	41.5	11.3	0.8
: Water Quality Index	1.5	6.5	39.8	40.0	12.2
: Air Quality Index	0.5	5.5	41.5	38.5	14
: Community Health Index	5.0	10.0	33.3	36.3	15.4
: Facility maintenance and upkeep	8.0	24.0	33.0	31.8	3.2
: Timeliness of services	6.5	14.5	34.5	38.0	6.5
: Psychological health improvement	2.5	5.0	43.8	35.0	13.7
: Ecological corridor connectivity	11	15.5	30.0	34.8	8.7
: Public participation	0.3	3.8	50.8	33.8	11.3
: Environmental protection	4.3	9.0	46.0	35.5	5.2