Research Article

HPV Prevalence in Colombian Women with Cervical Cancer: Implications for Vaccination in a Developing Country

Table 4

Impact of HPV vaccines according to age specific HPV prevalence.
(a) Cervical cancer incident cases

CountryGroup of ageTotal*
5050–59 60

Colombia, Cali4892173391045
Uganda, Kyadondo County3136970452
USA, Connecticut3825246480

(b) Expected incident cases and estimated impact of vaccination

Case 5050–59 60Impact based on global estimatesImpact based on age-specific estimates

HPV 16,18
Attributable cases (%)65.577.146.363.2
Colombia, Cali1695018263.261.7
Uganda, Kyadondo County108163863.264.3
USA, Connecticut132122563.264.9
HPV 16,18,45
Attributable cases (%)79.879.448.671.4
Colombia, Cali994517471.469.6
Uganda, Kyadondo County63143671.474.9
USA, Connecticut77112471.476.8
HPV 16,18,45,31
Attributable cases (%)85.280.658.476.8
Colombia, Cali724214176.875.6
Uganda, Kyadondo County46132976.880.3
USA, Connecticut57101976.882.1
HPV 16,18,45,58
Attributable cases (%)81.687.460.677.3
Colombia, Cali902713477.376.0
Uganda, Kyadondo County5892877.379.2
USA, Connecticut7071877.380.2

Incident cases in (a) based on 28. Attributable cases based on study results. Numbers for each country in (b) correspond to the expected number of cases given the percentage of attributable cases. The impact based on global estimates was obtained from cumulative percentages in Figure 1(a). The impact based on age-specific estimates corresponds to the reduction in number of cases as percentage of the initial number of cases, obtained from the summatory of expected cases in age groups ( 50, 50–59, 60). Single infections assumed after distribution of multiple infections.
*Total cases do not include unknown age.