Research Article

Endometrial Histopathology in Patients with Laparoscopic Proven Salpingitis and HIV-1 Infection

Table 2

Comparison of demographic, clinical history and signs, and laboratory findings for women laparoscopically diagnosed with salpingitis, with and without an endometrial biopsy adequate for histological evaluation.

VariablesAdequate biopsyInadequate biopsy value
(72%) (28%)

Demographics and history
Age mean (SD)27.8 (5.5)27.9 (6.1)0.9
Infertility ≥ 1 year26 (39%)3 (13%)0.02
Ever use of contraceptive:
 None56 (51%)23 (77%)Ref
 Oral contraceptives36 (47%)13 (43%)0.75
 DMPA18 (23%)14 (47%)0.02
 Intrauterine device13 (17%)3 (10%)0.37
Symptoms
Abnormal menstruation16 (21%)6 (21%)1.0
Clinical examination findings
Clinical severity score, median (mode) range
Total clinical severity score13 (8) 2815.5 (4) 300.03
Laparoscopic salpingitis severity
 Mild32 (42%)15 (50%)
 Moderate26 (36%)3 (10%)
 Severe19 (25%)12 (40%)0.04
Pelvic Abscess13 (17%)9 (30%)0.15
Laboratory Findings
HIV-127 (36%)17 (57%)0.05
CD4 count < 200/ L8 (11%)7 (23.3%)0.09
White cell count9.7 (6.04)10.3 (5.5)0.63
Lymphocytes (blood) %26.9 (13.4)19.1 (7.8)0.001
Gonorrhea and/or chlamydia11 (14%)8 (27%)0.13
Gonorrhea9 (12%)7 (23%)0.23
Chlamydia3 (4%)1 (3%)0.9
Trichomonas vaginalis14 (19%)6 (21%)0.8
Bacterial vaginosis (Gram’s stain)30 (45%)16 (62%)0.2