Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 857851, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/857851
Research Article

Clinicopathological Comparison of Adenocarcinoma of Cervix and Endometrium Using Cell Cycle Markers: P16ink4a, P21waf1, and p27Kip1 on 132 Cancers

1Pathology Department, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM), Kelantan, Malaysia
2Pathology Department, Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah (HSB), Alor Star, Malaysia

Received 10 March 2011; Revised 9 June 2011; Accepted 14 August 2011

Academic Editor: Pierre Martin-Hirsch

Copyright © 2011 Farveen Marican Abu Backer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. K. Kjaer and L. A. Brinton, “Adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix: the epidemiology of an increasing problem,” Epidemiologic Reviews, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 486–498, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. O. Smith, M. F. Tiffany, C. R. Qualls, and C. R. Key, “The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States—a 24-year population-based study,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Bray, B. Carstensen, H. Møller et al., “Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2191–2199, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. F. Parazzini and C. La Vecchia, “Epidemiology of adenocarcinoma of the cervix,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. M. Elwood, P. Cole, K. J. Rothman, and S. D. Kaplan, “Epidemiology of endometrial cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1055–1060, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Garg, K. Shih, R. Barakat, Q. Zhou, A. Iasonos, and R. A. Soslow, “Endometrial carcinomas in women aged 40 years and younger: tumors associated with loss of DNA mismatch repair proteins comprise a distinct clinicopathologic subset,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1869–1877, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. T. Gien, M. C. Beauchemin, and G. Thomas, “Adenocarcinoma: a unique cervical cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 140–146, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. H. Tay, M. L. Yeap, and T. H. Ho, “A 5-year review of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer in an Asian population,” Singapore Medical Journal, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 520–524, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. L. Cheah and L. M. Looi, “Carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a review of its pathology and commentary on the problem in Malaysians,” Malaysian Journal of Pathology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Tantbirojn, S. Triratanachat, P. Trivijitsilp, and S. Niruthisard, “Comparison between adenocarcinoma in both endocervical and endometrial specimens from fractional curettage and pathologic findings in subsequent hysterectomy specimens,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1313–1317, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Nieuwenhuizen, M. K. Khalil, N. Venkatesh, and N. H. Othman, “Endometrial and endocervical secretion: the search for histochemical differentiation,” Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Kamoi, M. I. AlJuboury, M. R. Akin, and S. G. Silverberg, “Immunohistochemical staining in the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas: another viewpoint,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 217–223, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. H. Castrillon, K. R. Lee, and M. R. Nucci, “Distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma: an immunohistochemical study,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 4–10, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Jiang, A. Malpica, M. T. Deavers et al., “Endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus involving the cervix: some cases probably represent independent primaries,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 146–156, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Missaoui, S. Hmissa, L. Frappart et al., “p16INK4A overexpression and HPV infection in uterine cervix adenocarcinoma,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 448, no. 5, pp. 597–603, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. J. Sherr, “Cancer cell cycles,” Science, vol. 274, no. 5293, pp. 1672–1677, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Abbas and A. Dutta, “P21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 400–414, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Huang, C. S. Chen, and D. E. Ingber, “Control of cyclin D1, p27(Kip1), and cell cycle progression in human capillary endothelial cells by cell shape and cytoskeletal tension,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 3179–3193, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. R. Ciocca, L. A. Puy, and L. C. Fasoli, “Study of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and the estrogen-regulated M(r) 24,000 protein in patients with carcinomas of the endometrium and cervix,” Cancer Research, vol. 49, no. 15, pp. 4298–4304, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. I. Pappa, M. Choleza, S. Markaki et al., “Consistent absence of BRAF mutations in cervical and endometrial cancer despite KRAS mutation status,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 596–600, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Yemelyanova, R. Vang, J. D. Seidman, P. E. Gravitt, and B. M. Ronnett, “Endocervical adenocarcinomas with prominent endometrial or endomyometrial involvement simulating primary endometrial carcinomas: utility of HPV DNA detection and immunohistochemical expression of p16 and hormone receptors to confirm the cervical origin of the corpus tumor,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 914–924, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Fujiwara, G. Tortolero-Luna, M. F. Mitchell, J. P. Koulos, and T. C. Wright Jr., “Adenocarcinoma of the cervix: expression and clinical significance of estrogen and progesterone receptors,” Cancer, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 505–512, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Ohta, T. Watanabe, Y. Katayama et al., “Aberrant promoter hypermethylation profile of cell cycle regulatory genes in malignant astrocytomas,” Oncology Reports, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 957–963, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Ishida, M. Nakamura, M. Ikuta et al., “Promotor hypermethylation of p14ARF is a key alteration for progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma,” Oral Oncology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 614–622, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Knopp, T. Bjørge, J. M. Nesland, C. Tropé, M. Scheistrøen, and R. Holm, “p16INK4a and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression correlates with clinical outcome in vulvar carcinomas,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. T. Nagao, I. Sugano, Y. Ishida et al., “Primary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the parotid gland: immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of two cases,” Modern Pathology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 554–561, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. Miladi-Abdennadher, R. Abdelmaksoud-Damak, L. Ayadi et al., “Aberrant methylation of hMLH1 and p16INK4a in Tunisian patients with sporadic colorectal adenocarcinoma,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 257–264, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar